SoVote

Andréanne Larouche

Member of Parliament
Member of Parliament
Bloc Québécois

Shefford
Quebec
Voting Attendance: 66%
Expenses Last Quarter: $81,135.43

Government Page

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Nov/6/23 12:26:38 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-34

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague, the member for Saint-Maurice—Champlain. I know that he runs his department with passion. I will speak briefly of the issue of closure motions in a minority government. As the closure motions keep on coming, we wonder if the government really understood the message it got from voters. They wanted it to reach agreements in the context of a minority government. Imposing one gag order after another is not what I would call taking into account the fact that it is a minority government. We voted for Bill C-34, but as my colleagues said, there are a few blind spots. In particular, the last update to the Investment Canada Act dates from 1985. I was not very old in 1985. That was some time ago. I would like to hear my colleague comment about how this would have been a great opportunity to update it completely in order to protect our domestic head offices, not just address the issue of national security. We could have extended the scope of the act to include that.

183 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 232 - Oct/16/23

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Oct/16/23 12:22:19 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-49

Madam Speaker, it is a little ironic to hear the government, and even the NDP in its questions, boasting about the much-vaunted 30% protected areas when the Liberal government itself authorized exploratory drilling in a marine refuge it created. How credible is the government when it comes to protecting and conserving oceans and endangered species? I have my doubts.

61 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 207 - Jun/6/23

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Jun/6/23 3:42:01 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-35

Mr. Speaker, I thank the minister for her speech. There is still one thing missing from Bill C-35, and I would like to hear her comments on that. It should be pointed out that the early childhood centre model and the vision of offering education to children who are not yet of school age was implemented in Quebec. That is where the model comes from. That expertise is even recognized throughout the world. Quebec's contribution was recognized in black and white in a previous bill. This bill, Bill C‑35, currently mentions a five-year period. What will happen after five years? Will the federal government start another dispute over Quebec's right to opt out with full compensation in recognition of its expertise? Why was this not included in black and white in this bill? For now, it is all right, but what will happen in five years' time?

153 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 133 - Nov/23/22

Ms. Andréanne Larouche

Nov/23/22 3:18:41 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, there have been discussions among the parties and, if you seek it, I believe you will find unanimous consent for the following motion: That this House call on the government to urgently establish an independent commission of inquiry into the toxic culture in Canadian sport organizations.

48 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 99 - Sep/21/22

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Sep/21/22 3:15:36 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, first I would like to acknowledge the hon. member for Willowdale, who wanted to introduce a similar motion. There have been discussions among the parties, and I think that you will find unanimous consent for the following motion: That the House offer its condolences to the relatives of Mahsa Amini, from her Kurdish name Jina, a 22-year-old woman who died after being arrested in Tehran for "wearing inappropriate clothing" by the Iranian morality police, and offer its solidarity to the women of Iran who are fighting for their rights and freedoms.

95 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 60 - Apr/28/22

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Apr/28/22 4:26:06 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-8

Madam Speaker, I know that I already spoke about this issue when I gave my speech on Bill C‑8. I spoke at length about it with my colleague from Joliette, and we came to the conclusion that this interferes in Quebec's and the provinces' jurisdiction over property tax. We are accused of picking fights, but why is the Liberal government constantly encroaching on the responsibilities of Quebec and the provinces? My colleague from Joliette may have an amendment to propose wherein the tax on secondary residences would apply only in the provinces that want it so that they, and Quebec of course, can choose for themselves. Why is the government taking a centralist approach yet again and trying to interfere in a jurisdiction belonging to Quebec and the provinces?

132 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 53 - Apr/5/22

Ms. Andréanne Larouche

Apr/5/22 3:13:51 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, I am rising on a point of order. There have been discussions among the parties and I believe you would find unanimous consent for the following motion: That this House designate the first Tuesday in April as Invisible Work Day and encourage all UN member states to do the same.

52 words

SoVote

Member of Parliament

Andréanne Larouche