SoVote

Andréanne Larouche

Member of Parliament
Member of Parliament
Bloc Québécois

Shefford
Quebec
Voting Attendance: 65%
Expenses Last Quarter: $81,135.43

Government Page

Context: House Hansard - 238 - Oct/24/23

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Oct/24/23 4:45:00 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-57

Mr. Speaker, we are in favour of the principle of this agreement. The Bloc Québécois is also an ally on the Ukraine issue. We agree on that. However, I would like to hear my colleague's views on a missed opportunity in this agreement, namely, bringing multinational corporations back under government authority rather than putting them on the same footing as governments. My colleague talked about oil companies and large energy corporations. There is a risk of lawsuits with these large multinationals. In short, putting them on the same footing and not restoring this inequality means that a state could become their puppet. The risk of a lawsuit is not trivial. I would like to know what my colleague thinks.

124 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 238 - Oct/24/23

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Oct/24/23 3:44:35 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-57

Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague who spoke a lot about energy and large multinational oil companies. Unfortunately, this type of agreement often puts multinationals, the big oil companies of the world, on the same footing as states. It is rather shameful and I would like my colleague to comment on that. With this agreement, we missed the opportunity to give more power back to states so that they take precedence over multinationals. There is a danger in letting these companies lead the world and take the place of states.

90 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 237 - Oct/23/23

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Oct/23/23 1:20:38 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-57

Mr. Speaker, we Quebeckers have worked really hard to protect supply management. My colleague from Saint-Hyacinthe—Bagot in particular has taken up that fight. The minister seemed to be saying this morning that supply-managed sectors would be excluded and therefore protected. There is definitely a lack of transparency. There are still many aspects of this bill that are worrisome. Can my colleague reiterate the importance of making the risk of prosecution the same for multinationals as for countries? What does he think should be done next to ensure that we get our fair share and that we can monitor the government's lack of transparency?

108 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 237 - Oct/23/23

Ms. Andréanne Larouche (Shefford, BQ)

Oct/23/23 12:24:56 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-57

Mr. Speaker, I would like to return to a question asked by my hon. colleague from Berthier—Maskinongé that the minister did not have time to answer. My colleague asked her two questions. She answered the question about supply management. However, concerning the fact that the government and multinationals are on an equal footing and that multinationals are therefore able to take legal action against states, would this not have been a good opportunity to reassert government jurisdiction over multinational corporations? I think it would have been a good opportunity. What does she think?

96 words

All Topics

SoVote

Member of Parliament

Andréanne Larouche