SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Andréanne Larouche

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Bloc Québécois
  • Shefford
  • Quebec
  • Voting Attendance: 66%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $81,135.43

  • Government Page
  • Nov/6/23 12:26:38 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-34 
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague, the member for Saint-Maurice—Champlain. I know that he runs his department with passion. I will speak briefly of the issue of closure motions in a minority government. As the closure motions keep on coming, we wonder if the government really understood the message it got from voters. They wanted it to reach agreements in the context of a minority government. Imposing one gag order after another is not what I would call taking into account the fact that it is a minority government. We voted for Bill C-34, but as my colleagues said, there are a few blind spots. In particular, the last update to the Investment Canada Act dates from 1985. I was not very old in 1985. That was some time ago. I would like to hear my colleague comment about how this would have been a great opportunity to update it completely in order to protect our domestic head offices, not just address the issue of national security. We could have extended the scope of the act to include that.
183 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/30/23 1:02:23 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-34 
Madam Speaker, like my colleague, I recognize that mergers have an impact, but hostile takeovers by foreign companies are especially worrisome. I would like him to comment on that. Bill C-34 is important and overdue. It is a welcome development, but it is incomplete because it does not actually resolve any of the issues. I would like to know what my colleague sees as the next steps. This is, of course, a good first step, but what will happen next? What can we do to better protect our economic levers? I am thinking about the head offices in Quebec, in particular. As a Quebecker, I am obviously going to stand up for my province.
116 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/30/23 12:47:29 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-34 
Madam Speaker, I recall very specifically that, during the 2019 election campaign, the leader of the Bloc Québécois, the member for Beloeil—Chambly, came to Shefford, to Valcourt, to present the Bloc Québécois's proposals regarding economic nationalism to protect our head offices. That is essential in Quebec. We have a completely different SME model, and Bill C-34 really overlooks that fact. I would like my colleague to talk about the importance of protecting our economic levers.
88 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Oct/30/23 12:31:07 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-34 
Madam Speaker, in addition to discussing public safety, my colleague addressed the issue of national security by talking about the armed forces and commenting on that. I would like to know whether he agrees that beyond the issue of national security, there is a blind spot in this bill, namely the matter of preserving our economic levers. I would like to know what he thinks because we have some head offices to protect. How does this bill respond, or fail to respond, to my colleague's expectations when it comes to further protecting our economic levers?
96 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border