SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Hon. Marco Mendicino

  • Member of Parliament
  • Liberal
  • Eglinton—Lawrence
  • Ontario
  • Voting Attendance: 64%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $83,797.98

  • Government Page
  • Jun/14/23 2:41:13 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, my colleague across the way is not the final arbiter of trust. It is Canadians. We are working hard every single day to protect public safety. We have introduced Bill C-21, which will take AR15-style guns out of our communities. The Conservatives want to make those types of guns legal again. My colleague refers to the so-called police stations. The RCMP has repeatedly confirmed that it has taken disruptive action to stop foreign interference in relation to those so-called police stations. On the matter of Paul Bernardo, there is an internal review. We are working with the families. We will always stand up for victims' rights.
112 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/13/23 3:13:27 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, to eradicate gun violence, we need strong laws and strong borders and strong prevention. We are rolling out a $250-million “building safer communities” fund to address the root causes that my colleague talks about. However, I also want to call on the leader of the Conservative Party of Canada to free his Conservative senators and free the bill. Bill C-21 is in the Senate right now. We need to read it, debate it and pass it into law so that we can save lives. It is only the Conservatives who continue to stand in the way of this legislation. All other four parties in this House passed it. Let us save lives.
118 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/23 10:14:38 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
moved: Motion No. 10 That Bill C-21, in Clause 36, be amended by replacing lines 16 and 17 on page 45 with the following: “must deliver to a peace officer any firearm that they possess within 24 hours or” Motion No. 11 That Bill C-21, in Clause 37, be amended (a) by replacing line 4 on page 46 with the following: “or a chief firearms officer” (b) by replacing line 19 on page 46 with the following: “cer the firearm to which” (c) by replacing lines 29 and 30 on page 46 with the following: “ferred to in subsection (4), deliver to a peace officer any firearm that they pos-”
120 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/16/23 10:14:38 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
moved: That Bill C-21, in Clause 45, be amended by adding after line 5 on page 51 the following: “(1.11) The portion of paragraph 117(k) of the Act after subparagraph (ii) is replaced by the following: of firearms, prohibited weapons, restricted weapons, prohibited devices, ammunition, prohibited ammunition, cartridge magazines and components and parts designed exclusively for use in the manufacture of or assembly into firearms;”
70 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/23 4:33:41 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, I can assure my hon. colleague from London that, as he knows, we have been working with rural communities and first nations communities right across the country. In fact, I have spent a good, considerable period of time with a number of experts in gaming and hunting in the Yukon, where I had a chance to see how they participate in their traditions. I have nothing but the utmost respect for the way in which they participate in their traditions in a way that is safe and secure. I have also assured them, as we have done with indigenous communities, that this bill would reflect their lived experiences. What does that mean in plain and simple terms? It means that this bill would not target them. Rather, it would go after criminals. It would go after AR-15 assault-style firearms. Yes, it would implement a national freeze on handguns, because handguns have been growing by approximately 55,000 new registrations every year and they have concurrently become the number one type of gun used in homicides. Those are the types of evidence-based, informed policies that are in Bill C-21, and that is why it would help save lives.
203 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/23 4:31:57 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, there are at least two serious mistakes in the premise of the Conservative member's question. The first is that we are not going after criminals. In Bill C-21, as I have just mentioned, we would raise maximum sentences from 10 to 14 years for illegal gun traffickers. That is an important and powerful signal to anyone who would try to terrorize our communities that they will run the risk of going to jail for a longer period of time. The Conservative member also referred to prevention. That is precisely what the government is doing with a $250-million building safer communities fund. I would point out that the Conservatives have opposed the building safer communities fund's allocations, which will save lives through prevention by providing mental health services and other supports for people who are at most risk. The Conservatives are also against Bill C-21, which would give law enforcement the additional tools to go after criminals who use firearms to commit crimes. That is why their position is so misguided. On this side of the House, we are doing the work. We are making sure that we pass responsible gun control legislation, but we are also taking action at the border and advancing strong prevention strategies.
213 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/23 4:13:05 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, my colleague on this side of the government aisle is correct. The vast majority of Canadians, approximately 80% of Canadians, support a national ban against AR-15 style, assault-style firearms. They support a national freeze on handguns. Handguns have become the number one type of gun used in homicides. Canadians support and want to see action that will allow us to reverse the disturbing and alarming trends of domestic abuse and the presence of guns. Again, women are disproportionately victimized as a result of the presence of guns. We want to reverse those trends. We want to save lives, which is precisely why we need to move forward with Bill C-21. Were it not for the Conservatives who continue to obstruct and obfuscate, we would be able to do that more quickly. That is why we are taking the step that we are today, and we will continue to engage with all Canadians so we can keep them safe.
163 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/23 4:11:42 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, nothing could be further from the truth. Contrary to the ongoing efforts by the Conservatives to stoke fear, we respect gun owners, farmers and the first nations communities who use firearms responsibly. I have engaged with all of them, and we have gone to great lengths to make sure we are weaving their experiences into our laws. Therefore, rather than stoke fear and disinformation among Canadians, it would be far more productive if Conservatives were prepared to have a debate based on facts, not fear. That is what we are doing with other parties in this chamber, including the NDP and the Bloc, and I want to thank them for their collaboration on Bill C-21.
118 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/23 4:08:18 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, I have worked very closely with my friend and colleague, the member for Surrey—Newton, when it comes to keeping our communities safe. As he knows, we recently made an announcement in his riding that will provide additional grassroots support to the organizations providing mental health services, educational supports and career supports, especially to those young people who are at the greatest risk of being exposed to gun violence. I want to emphasize that this is a government that is squarely focused on three priorities when it comes to reducing gun violence: strong borders, strong laws and enforcement, and strong prevention. Together, with the support of a number of other opposition parties, it is my sincere hope that we will pass Bill C-21 so we can put in place strong gun control laws to save lives.
140 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/23 4:06:49 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, I would want to go to great lengths to speak extemporaneously from my knowledge of this file. I will tell members, though, that, with regard to Bill C-21, there have been 15 meetings, 79 witnesses and approximately 40 hours spent, despite the fact that, at various junctures in this debate, we have seen the Conservatives filibuster in an effort to stop a responsible rigorous debate on gun control laws in this country. This is not the first time this has occurred. This is consistent with a pattern of obstruction and obfuscation by principally one party in the chamber, which is the Conservatives. We want to protect Canadians, and we believe that, by passing Bill C-21, we will promote responsible gun control and save lives.
128 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/8/23 3:03:42 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, there they go again; Conservatives are trying to stoke fear. If my colleague had actually read the amendments that are part of Bill C-21, he would have seen that we included a non-derogation clause specifically for indigenous persons, but he did not read them. Instead, the Conservatives are just filibustering. They are about their record of putting cuts to police budgets. They are about weakening our borders. On this side of the House, we are going to keep our communities safe by strengthening our borders, by putting more resources into law enforcement and by passing strong gun control laws.
103 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/8/23 3:02:19 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, respectfully, that is exactly what the government is doing. Last week, I was very proud to see that members of our caucus had put forward amendments to Bill C-21 that would strengthen the national ban that the government put into place on AR-15 style firearms, which have absolutely no legitimate recreational purpose in any of our communities. It is only the Conservatives who continue to put forward policies that amount to legalizing AR-15 style firearms. That is the wrong path. They need to get behind Bill C-21 so we can save lives.
98 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jan/31/23 3:08:57 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, as my hon. colleague knows, and I hope all members will have seen, this government is engaging with hunters, trappers, first nations and indigenous groups to make sure that their experiences are woven into the good work that we are doing under Bill C-21, which, of course, is to target those guns that have been used in mass killings. We couple that with the work that we are doing to stop illegal smuggling at the border, which was $450 million. What did the Conservatives do? They voted against it. We couple that with the work that we are doing to prevent gun crime, a $250-million building safer communities fund. What did the Conservatives do? They voted against it. Look beyond the words and look at their actions. They need to reverse their course and support the government's work to keep Canadians safe.
147 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jan/31/23 3:05:16 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, we promised Canadians that we would take action and tackle gun violence. Our plan includes investing nearly half a billion dollars to stop illegal smuggling at the border, addressing the root causes of gun crime through the building safer communities fund, and introducing legislation that promotes the responsible use of firearms, specifically Bill C-21. That is why I hope the Conservatives will reverse their position, support our investments and support common-sense legislation.
76 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/13/22 3:12:22 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, I assure my colleague that we are indeed listening to indigenous peoples. Last week, I spent the better part of a morning consulting and engaging with indigenous leaders right across the country to make sure we protect indigenous traditions, including as it relates to food security. We are creating space for indigenous-led initiatives when it comes to public safety, and we are going to make sure the language of Bill C-21 aligns with our government's priority, which is to take those guns that were designed for the battlefield off our streets and protect indigenous traditions at the same time.
104 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/13/22 2:58:32 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, I assure my colleague that we are doing precisely that, including with Bill C-21, which would raise maximum sentences against hardened gun traffickers and give police additional powers to bust up those networks that terrorize our communities. We also introduced $450 million over the last two years for the CBSA to stop illegal gun smuggling at the border. What did the Conservatives do? They voted against it. They have got to walk the talk on this. The Conservatives have reversed their position, and they should support Bill C-21 and all of the support we are offering law enforcement on the front lines.
106 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/7/22 2:54:28 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, the answer is that the Conservatives are. The reason is that we have been consistent all along in that we are not targeting law-abiding gun owners. We are not targeting guns that are commonly used for hunting. Rather, we are targeting guns that have been used in some of the worst mass shootings in this country's history, including at Polytechnique, where yesterday, the Prime Minister, a number of colleagues and I were able to grieve and stand in solidarity with those victims from Polytechnique. I think we need to be united behind the cause of doing better in honour of the legacy of those victims, and that is precisely what Bill C-21 would do. It is high time for the Conservatives to reverse their position and support that bill.
135 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/5/22 2:54:08 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, before I was rudely interrupted by the Conservatives, and am again— Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Hon. Marco Mendicino: I was highlighting the incredible work of our rural caucus, and indeed of all of our caucus, who understand the importance of the traditions of hunting. I have met with them and will continue to be sure we are not targeting those hunting guns. That is why we are working closely with the members of the committee who are undertaking a very careful study of the language of that bill to make sure it is in alignment with our intent, which is to go after those AR-15 style firearms that were used in the likes of Polytechnique. We never want another one of those tragedies again.
129 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/5/22 2:53:33 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, I will be the first person to stand up and applaud the exemplary work of our rural caucus who defend the rights of hunters, collectors and recreational sport shooters every day. Some hon. members: Oh, oh! Hon. Marco Mendicino: The Conservatives can mock, but our side of the House knows full well— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
60 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/5/22 2:52:07 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-21 
Mr. Speaker, with great respect for my colleague, the intent of the government has always been clear. We are not targeting law-abiding gun owners or hunters. We are targeting the AR-15 style guns used in some of the worst shooting tragedies in this country's history, including Polytechnique. Recently the Conservatives' friends at the Coalition for Firearms Rights exploited the worst femicide in Canadian history for profit. This was a slap in the face to all the families the victims and survivors of Polytechnique. Will the Conservatives stand up now, condemn the CCFR and ask it to apologize?
100 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border