SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Yves-François Blanchet

  • Member of Parliament
  • Leader of the Bloc Québécois
  • Bloc Québécois
  • Beloeil—Chambly
  • Quebec
  • Voting Attendance: 56%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $98,385.23

  • Government Page
  • Nov/21/23 2:30:37 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I wonder if maybe I should send my questions to the Prime Minister ahead of time, so that the answer might have something to do with the question. I understand that there will be no extra money for seniors. I understand that there will be no money for the tens of thousands of businesses that are at risk of closing as a result of the pandemic. Maybe the government is afraid of running out of money, but I have an idea for the government. Why does it not just eliminate the oil subsidies so it can support seniors and businesses?
102 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Sep/20/23 2:42:14 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, this week, Calgary is hosting the World Petroleum Congress. Ottawa has sent three ministers there. That sends a clear message. At the same time, they have the nerve to attend a United Nations meeting on climate change. Meanwhile, oil and gas companies are lining their pockets. Everyone knows that the main reason gas prices have gone up is oil and gas company profits. Will the government announce an end to all oil and gas subsidies at the UN?
81 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/8/23 2:28:22 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I feel like I have gone back in time 10 years. No serious person can deny that oil and gas are to blame for some of the terrible tragedies happening around the world, and increasingly right here, too. This obsession with oil comes at a very high price. Will the Prime Minister agree to halt all forms of funding, direct or indirect, to the oil companies and transfer the money saved to Quebec and the provinces in order to increase funding for research into mitigating the effects of climate change and the measures required to protect ourselves, particularly when it comes to municipal infrastructure?
106 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/8/23 10:29:45 a.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, a number of suggestions come to mind. As I recently said in the House, we need to walk the talk. In this case, that means that we need to do whatever it takes—even if we are hogtied and gagged—to prevent a government partner from spending billions of dollars on measures that support the oil-related economic chain. That in itself would be a major contribution.
71 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/8/23 10:26:10 a.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, unfortunately, the reality is one of investments in the form of tax credits or assistance for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions resulting from the process of extracting petroleum resources. The only petroleum resources that are safe to develop are biofuels and biogas. They exist, but that is not what we are talking about. The suggested approach is not really useful. If the industry were able to lower its emissions per barrel, it would only produce more barrels. Our money would then be used solely to maintain the level of greenhouse gas emissions. We need to go a step further and transition away from oil.
107 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/29/23 2:31:15 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, as it stands, carbon capture is not green, grey hydrogen is not green, nuclear energy is not green and Arctic offshore oil is not green. Will the government admit that the big news in yesterday's budget, approximately $17 billion, is intended exclusively for oil companies?
50 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/14/22 2:29:33 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, that is some climate humour right there. His very own experts, the ones he quotes when it suits him, say that the only way we just might be able to meet the targets is, one, forget about this sequestration nonsense and, two, cut production. Will the Prime Minister at the very least cut all oil industry subsidies?
59 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/2/22 2:42:52 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, things are moving faster and faster, if not backwards, and Europe is no longer dependent on Russian energy. Ukraine's IPCC representative says that oil is not the solution. The UN says that oil is not the solution. I wonder what the Minister of Environment says about oil being the solution. If the Prime Minister wants to switch to blue, can he choose the right blue?
69 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/2/22 2:41:32 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the argument we hear in connection with fossil fuel issues is “energy security”, but Canada's energy security is not at risk because Canada can meet its own fossil fuel needs. We do not need Russian oil. This sanction is meaningless. Europe's energy security does not seem to be in jeopardy either because OPEC can boost production as needed and the United States can supply natural gas to Germany in particular. Does the Prime Minister agree that the Conservative argument he seems to be backing is an excuse?
93 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/2/22 2:29:09 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, there are some matters on which we agree, such as co-operation with major international institutions and humanitarian assistance, which must be generous, and which is ultimately more important that military assistance. There are, however, some matters on which we do not quite agree. I refuse to believe that the government would endorse the idea that we need to send western oil to help Ukraine, which does not even want it. I thought that maybe there was just a misunderstanding or that yesterday's question was misinterpreted. I want to give the Prime Minister another chance. Does the Prime Minister support the hare-brained idea that we should send oil from western Canada to Europe to support Ukraine?
120 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/1/22 10:19:31 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I stand corrected. Obviously, my colleague was not talking about Jean Charest's campaign. Mr. Charest is opposed to pipelines and he is behind the carbon tax. My colleague must have been talking about someone else. That is to his credit because the Conservatives are entitled to their own leadership race. There is another race, the race for the planet's survival. Some people say that they believe in climate change as long as they do not have to do anything about it. As long as it is pointless and meaningless, they recognize it. However, the reality is that we need to take action. Some members think it is inappropriate to say that oil is dead, but oil has to at least be in intensive care if we want the planet to have a decent future.
140 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/28/22 7:26:17 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I do not want to derail this debate entirely, but that report is alarming. It really made me question whether the people who hold the political and economic power are prepared to deal with or mitigate the fallout of climate change. Are they just insulating themselves from the impact of climate change by accumulating more wealth and selling more oil? Climate change will hurt many other people who are far less wealthy. That is horribly cynical. I do not think that producing and exporting more oil helps Ukraine or anyone. I think that we need to be looking at other solutions all around. Obviously, since we need to transition much more quickly, western Canada will not be a supplier for Europe.
123 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/28/22 7:22:40 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, merit comes with intent. What is the intention here? Is the intention of my colleague's remarks to generously and compassionately ensure Europe's energy security? Or is this just another attempt to find new markets to increase trade in western Canadian oil? There is no scenario in which western Canada would be able to get oil to Europe in a timely manner using the infrastructure projects we have heard about. It would have to use completely archaic means of transport.
83 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border