SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of the Joint Interparliamentary Council

Michael Cooper

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of the Joint Interparliamentary Council
  • Conservative
  • St. Albert—Edmonton
  • Alberta
  • Voting Attendance: 67%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $119,185.60

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 316 - May/23/24
Mr. Michael Cooper
  • May/23/24 9:28:31 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, first, paragraph 23 of the RCMP investigation report states that it should be emphasized that the conclusions reached in the report do not translate to the absence of a criminal offence. In other words, the Prime Minister has not been cleared by the RCMP. Second, paragraph 24 of the report says that if there is additional evidence, the RCMP will reopen the investigation. The reason the RCMP had to close the investigation is that the Prime Minister is hiding behind cabinet documents that go to the heart of whether he obstructed justice. Is not the real reason the Prime Minister continues to hide behind cabinet confidence that he obstructed justice? He fired Jody Wilson-Raybould because she stood up to his corrupt demands that she interfere in the prosecution of SNC-Lavalin. Is that not what happened?
139 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 208 - Jun/7/23
Mr. Michael Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton, CPC)
  • Jun/7/23 2:43:22 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, a report of the government's rapid response mechanism identified that Beijing-controlled social media accounts were spreading disinformation in the 2021 election targeting the Conservative Party, including an account with 26 million followers, yet incredibly the rapporteur concluded otherwise. He ignored the report, ignored the evidence and instead whitewashed Beijing's interference. The conclusions of the rapporteur have no credibility. Will the Prime Minister fire him and finally call an independent public inquiry?
76 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 208 - Jun/7/23
Mr. Michael Cooper (St. Albert—Edmonton, CPC)
  • Jun/7/23 2:42:04 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the Prime Minister's loyal rapporteur was asked to reconcile his conclusion that the spreading of disinformation in the 2021 election could not be attributed to the Beijing regime with the CSIS briefing to the former leader of the Conservative Party that said the opposite. The rapporteur said that he based his conclusion on evidence that he had at the time, evidence that was provided by the government. Did the rapporteur ignore material evidence, or did the government withhold it from him? Which one is it?
89 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border