SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of the Subcommittee on Review of Parliament’s involvement with associations and recognized Interparliamentary groups Deputy whip of the Bloc Québécois Member of the Joint Interparliamentary Council

Marilène Gill

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of the Subcommittee on Review of Parliament’s involvement with associations and recognized Interparliamentary groups Deputy whip of the Bloc Québécois Member of the Joint Interparliamentary Council
  • Bloc Québécois
  • Manicouagan
  • Quebec
  • Voting Attendance: 65%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $175,049.14

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 166 - Mar/8/23
Mrs. Marilène Gill (Manicouagan, BQ)
  • Mar/8/23 3:09:44 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, another one of the Prime Minister's solutions is to appoint a special rapporteur, who will be happy to do his bidding, kind of like our leader's golden retriever. We do not need a special report. What we need is a commissioner that all parties in the House agree on to head up an independent public commission on foreign interference in elections. Why is the Prime Minister stubbornly refusing to set up an independent public commission?
79 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 166 - Mar/8/23
Mrs. Marilène Gill (Manicouagan, BQ)
  • Mar/8/23 3:08:13 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, according to Global News, the Prime Minister's Office was informed in 2019 and 2022 about Chinese authorities interfering in our elections. Nothing was ever revealed; the information was hidden. Either the Prime Minister ignored it, which is dangerously negligent, or he was not informed directly, which means someone on his team was dangerously irresponsible. Now the Prime Minister's solution is to appoint a secret committee. This is just more secrecy. Why is the Prime Minister refusing to create an independent public commission of inquiry?
88 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 70 - May/12/22
Mrs. Marilène Gill (Manicouagan, BQ)
  • May/12/22 4:12:10 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I thank my colleague for his speech. I always like hearing what he has to say. He concluded his speech on China by talking about greenhouse gas emission rates. He said that Canada produces 1.6% of greenhouse gas emissions, while China produces 27%. I would like to bring to my colleague's attention to the fact that the entire world did not experience the industrial revolution at the same time. Canada's greenhouse gas emissions rate has not always been what it is today. Does my colleague not think that we can work on both fronts? Of course, China could probably be doing something, and I will not get into that, but at the same time, there is certainly something we could be doing as well. For example, today the government was asked to stop subsidizing oil companies. Should we not be doing both if we really want to reduce greenhouse gas emissions?
156 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border