SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Louise Chabot

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of the panel of chairs for the legislative committees
  • Bloc Québécois
  • Thérèse-De Blainville
  • Quebec
  • Voting Attendance: 68%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $122,743.44

  • Government Page
  • Nov/7/23 10:32:30 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I have a question for my colleague. In Quebec, we heat and light our homes with hydroelectric power, a clean and renewable energy. In your measures, how did you distinguish between the provinces that use less clean forms of energy and those, like Quebec, that use renewable, more environmentally friendly energies?
53 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/1/23 10:41:36 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, with all due respect to my colleague, there are some fallacies in the objectives of this proposal. At the same time, we can acknowledge that some people are struggling with inflation. I just finished a visit where I met with seniors. There is definitely cause to ask the federal government to do more for the most vulnerable. However, continuing to rely on oil and hydrocarbons to contribute to socio-economic conditions seems to be exactly the opposite of what we should be doing. Why is my colleague stuck on the idea of denying climate change and continuing to increase its effects by promoting oil and gas?
108 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/17/22 4:22:30 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I completely agree with the speech denouncing the use of carbon capture technologies, which will benefit the oil companies. However, there is something I do not understand. I would like the member to explain to me how she can condemn this practice and at the same time praise it in the last budget.
55 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/3/22 12:27:51 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I would like to commend my colleague. The first part of his speech truly reflects how we all feel about this war in Ukraine and the distress this is causing people we meet in our communities. I believe that is what points (a) and (b) of the Conservative motion are all about. With regard to point (c), my colleague mentioned the urgent warning and energy security. I would like to ask him the following question. Given the urgent warning to all countries on climate change and the warning that we must find concrete, pragmatic and meaningful responses for Ukrainians, does my colleague believe that betting on pipelines, the continuity of energy policy—
115 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/3/22 10:55:18 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I would like to come back to the Conservative Party motion. Does the Liberal government believe that by building pipelines, thereby “allowing Canadian natural gas to displace Russian natural gas”, as the motion calls for, we will will meet the current needs of a serious war and crisis in Ukraine, where thousands of women and children are forced to flee and leave the men behind? Does my colleague think that is the solution?
77 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border