SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Jeremy Patzer

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Cypress Hills—Grasslands
  • Saskatchewan
  • Voting Attendance: 67%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $112,746.42

  • Government Page
  • Dec/4/23 6:53:19 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I unreservedly withdraw the statement.
7 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/4/23 6:47:18 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I withdraw my statement since it caused disorder in the House.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/23/23 10:39:01 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, on a point of order, the member opposite knows he cannot do indirectly what he cannot do directly. I would ask him to withdraw his previous statement.
29 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/21/22 12:34:07 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, the fall economic statement would have been a perfect time for the government to take its commitment to just transition communities seriously. There are many communities not only in my riding and other ridings in Saskatchewan, but also in his home province, that are on the path to being completely left behind in the government's reckless plan to eliminate the workforce from a lot of these communities as they go through this coal transition, which is being forced upon them by the government. I want a straight answer from the member. Why has he turned his back on these communities and not allowing for the certainty these communities need and deserve by making sure there was proper wording and allocations in this economic statement for these communities, which is something the government promised to do and has failed to do?
143 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/21/22 12:21:12 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, the member opposite is all too happy to drive the number one driver of the economy in his home province into the ground. The fall economic statement talks about how our closest partners are shifting their strategic reliance from dictatorships to democracies. However, it does not give a plan about how the government itself is going to shift its support from dictatorships to democracies. The member is systematically driving our industry into the ground, so that the dollars go to dictatorships and not to democracies and the oil and gas sector. When the government limits debate on this, it limits Conservatives' ability to go through this statement, this plan, take it apart and show how we can better support Canadians and help make sure we are supporting democracies and not dictatorships. What does the member have to say to that?
142 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border