SoVote

Jeremy Patzer

Member of Parliament
Member of Parliament
Conservative

Cypress Hills—Grasslands
Saskatchewan
Voting Attendance: 67%
Expenses Last Quarter: $112,746.42

Government Page

Context: House Hansard - 281 - Feb/13/24

Feb/13/24 9:29:21 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, there are a few important points that we need to talk about first. First of all, the Liberals did not actually complete the mandatory review that the original legislation had. If that review had happened properly, I would be willing to bet that we would not be where we are today. The next point I want to make is that a couple of years ago the government promised $4.5 billion or maybe $6 billion for mental health. I do not remember the exact amount. I stand to be corrected, but as far as I am aware, so far, it is zero dollars. The government talks about making sure there are supports there for people with mental health, but the only support I am aware of right now is the 988 hotline that my Conservative colleague has been able to get in place.

145 words

Context: House Hansard - 264 - Dec/7/23

Mr. Jeremy Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC)

Dec/7/23 3:10:03 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, after eight years of the NDP-Liberal government, Canadians are out of money and the Prime Minister is out of touch. At a time when energy security is crucial, this makes life harder for Canadians and our allies. An emissions cap would destroy hundreds of thousands of jobs and billions in exports and would make life more unaffordable for Canadians. Instead of supporting powerful paycheques for our people, the Prime Minister supports dollars for dictators. When will the Liberals' costly coalition stop supporting dirty dictator oil and make Canada export the resources the world so desperately needs?

99 words

Context: House Hansard - 209 - Jun/8/23

Mr. Jeremy Patzer

Jun/8/23 11:46:22 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, in short, unfortunately the answer is no. My private member's bill, which deals with interoperability, could actually help deal with some of the issues in the rail line system. It is going to help pave the way to be able to do that, so we have some commonality there. When it comes to the trade agreements, my colleague from Abbotsford was somebody who negotiated a lot of those and got deals signed. Unfortunately, due to delays, maybe from some of the other countries and whatnot, the Conservatives did not get them fully implemented. Yes, the government finished some of those off, but it made some changes to them that we do not necessarily agree with. The big point about the Port of Vancouver in particular is that it is the third-worst port in the world. Prince Rupert is the ninth-worst port. These are ports that could have huge potential. They could be in the top 50 ports in the world with no problem. They could be, and they should be. The potential is there for them to be able to do that. I do not see anything in the 108 or 109 pages of this bill that would actually make sure that those ports go from being at the bottom of the pile to the top of the pile.

224 words

Context: House Hansard - 209 - Jun/8/23

Mr. Jeremy Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC)

Jun/8/23 11:02:36 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, there is an issue with the bill about creating a bunch of new advisory bodies and a bunch of new committees. Going back to other bills the government has implemented where new committees and new advisory panels have been struck, quite often we see a stacking of the deck, with a bunch of Liberal insiders on the panels. At the end of the day, it is delaying things and causing issues in trying to get projects completed and built. I know that people in Saskatchewan desperately need a port modernization strategy so we can get our products out of the Prairies. We are landlocked. We need the ports. These advisory panels generally do not do any good in helping the people in our situation. I am wondering if my colleague has any thoughts about that.

137 words

Context: House Hansard - 75 - May/19/22

Mr. Jeremy Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC)

May/19/22 2:44:53 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, we learned this week that India has placed a ban on wheat exports as a result of poor crop yields. It is Canada's responsibility to step up to the plate and meet this new global demand, but because of the current government's failed policies, like the carbon tax and a failure to grow our export markets, our farmers are now left with their hands tied. Why has the minister failed to secure greater market access for Canadian wheat, which would allow our farmers to step up and meet this looming global food shortage?

97 words

SoVote

Member of Parliament

Jeremy Patzer