SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of Parliament

Jeremy Patzer

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Cypress Hills—Grasslands
  • Saskatchewan
  • Voting Attendance: 67%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $112,746.42

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 318 - May/27/24
Mr. Jeremy Patzer
  • May/27/24 1:26:52 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, putting the livelihoods of tens of thousands of fishers and all the spinoff industry that comes from it at the behest of another industry is not the way we build an economy. It is not the way we get more people involved in the economy. As the witnesses, who I referenced in my speech, talked about, they are happy to see more economic development in the region. They just want to see the process done properly. They want to see proper consultation. Many fisher groups, Unifor, talked about how there was a complete lack of consultation with the fishers and the different associations in the fishing community. They are worried that their livelihood will be lost because there is a lack of certainty and clarity in this legislation.
130 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 312 - May/9/24
Mr. Jeremy Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC)
  • May/9/24 6:31:06 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, this is another embarrassing admission by the government that it has completely failed in its role. We have already had one vote on budget 2024, and yet the fall economic statement is before us tonight. Of course, the government is going to time allocate it. It has been months since it was brought up for debate. This is an admission of failure on the government's part. Why is it so bad at managing the calendar and getting things done?
82 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 298 - Apr/11/24
Mr. Jeremy Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC)
  • Apr/11/24 11:24:40 a.m.
  • Watch
moved: That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 35 on page 10 to line 6 on page 11 with the following: “include a summary of available data related to economic growth and the labour market in a net-zero economy;”
47 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 131 - Nov/21/22
Mr. Jeremy Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC)
  • Nov/21/22 1:34:15 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, I am wondering if my colleague can break down a bit more some of the regional issues she is facing in her community that are not being addressed or are being failed by this fall economic statement.
39 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 131 - Nov/21/22
Mr. Jeremy Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC)
  • Nov/21/22 12:34:07 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, the fall economic statement would have been a perfect time for the government to take its commitment to just transition communities seriously. There are many communities not only in my riding and other ridings in Saskatchewan, but also in his home province, that are on the path to being completely left behind in the government's reckless plan to eliminate the workforce from a lot of these communities as they go through this coal transition, which is being forced upon them by the government. I want a straight answer from the member. Why has he turned his back on these communities and not allowing for the certainty these communities need and deserve by making sure there was proper wording and allocations in this economic statement for these communities, which is something the government promised to do and has failed to do?
143 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 131 - Nov/21/22
Mr. Jeremy Patzer (Cypress Hills—Grasslands, CPC)
  • Nov/21/22 12:21:12 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-32 
Madam Speaker, the member opposite is all too happy to drive the number one driver of the economy in his home province into the ground. The fall economic statement talks about how our closest partners are shifting their strategic reliance from dictatorships to democracies. However, it does not give a plan about how the government itself is going to shift its support from dictatorships to democracies. The member is systematically driving our industry into the ground, so that the dollars go to dictatorships and not to democracies and the oil and gas sector. When the government limits debate on this, it limits Conservatives' ability to go through this statement, this plan, take it apart and show how we can better support Canadians and help make sure we are supporting democracies and not dictatorships. What does the member have to say to that?
142 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border