SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Committee

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
November 21, 2022
Context: Bill S-211 (FAAE) - Nov/21/22
Ms. Heather McPherson
  • 04:25:25 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Thank you. I'm not sure if Mr. Thomas is able to finish his thoughts. We were having some struggles with his mike. If he can, though, I would like him to comment.
33 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 04:25:34 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Yes. I can assure you that he is now properly connected. He should be audible.
15 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Ms. Heather McPherson
  • 04:25:39 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Perhaps I could give him the last little bit of time.
11 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Kevin Thomas
  • 04:25:47 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Can I proceed now?
4 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 04:25:47 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Yes. Please do.
3 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Kevin Thomas
  • 04:25:48 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Great. Before I speak to the contents of the current bill, maybe I can provide a brief example to demonstrate the challenge that Ms. McPherson just mentioned of only requiring modern slavery reporting versus requiring an obligation to perform human rights due diligence. Last year, on behalf of its shareholders, we began engaging a Canadian-headquartered multinational renewable energy company after it was reliably identified as having supply chain links to forced labour in the Xinjiang region of China. Actually, shipments of its product were even reportedly detained by U.S. customs officials, as we were just talking about, on suspicion of these links. We had a clear case of very material risk to the company and its investors. Despite those credible allegations, the company said, “There's no forced labour in our supply chain. We don't believe there's forced labour in our industry.” In fact, the company, and many of the investors we reached out to, said this company has a modern slavery statement. It's right there on its website, and it says everything is fine. They have zero tolerance for forced labour anywhere in their supply chain. But this statement didn't include any detailed information that would help the investors know whether the company is taking meaningful and effective action to implement these commitments. There's no indication of how they identify human rights impacts, which stakeholders are consulted, how many instances were investigated and acted on and what corrective actions the company has taken. In fact, our review, when we looked closer, found that the company didn't have any system for investigating or addressing human rights impacts in the Xinjiang region, and for good reason: Investigators can't even get into that region to check allegations of human rights abuses. When we continued to try to push the company on this and develop a due diligence system, they said, “Just trust us.” I tell you that story because it's indicative of the primary challenges we have as pension plans, banks, and asset management firms here in Canada when we're trying to meet our fiduciary duties, to assess risk. We can't properly assess it without this kind of—
373 words
All Tags
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 04:27:52 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I'm sorry, but we are considerably over the time slot that was provided.
14 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Ms. Heather McPherson
  • 04:27:59 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Mr. Chair, I'm wondering if we could let him finish. We did invite him to come and I'm prepared to give him my time, but I—
29 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 04:28:00 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
That's fair enough, but we're also eating into every other member's time as well.
17 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Ms. Heather McPherson
  • 04:28:05 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
We would have normally given him the time to speak, though, I think.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 04:28:13 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I'm terribly sorry for this technical difficulty, Mr. Thomas. We have received your statement. We will ensure that it's translated and sent to all of the members. If there's anything additional that you would like to explain to members of the committee, we would welcome that as well. Thank you.
53 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Kevin Thomas
  • 04:28:31 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
I appreciate that, Mr. Chair. Thank you.
7 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
The Chair
  • 04:28:32 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Thank you, Mr. Thomas. We will now go to the second round, and each member has three minutes. Mr. Epp, the floor is yours.
24 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Dave Epp (Chatham-Kent—Leamington, CPC)
  • 04:28:43 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Thank you, Mr. Chair, and thank you to the witnesses. I'm going to begin with a statement to Mr. Dumas. I appreciated your comments clarifying child labour. With my own background, growing up on a family farm, my parents did not interfere with my education, and the four daughters on our own farm were raised with love and an encouragement to work. So I understand those nuances. I have not brought tomatoes to this committee yet, but I will today, because that is my background. I'd like to go to Mr. Brown, please. The world produces about 37.2 million tonnes of processed tomato products. China did 6.2 million tonnes last year, of which five million came from Xinjiang province. There are certainly allegations of forced labour from the Uighur population, particularly in the tomato industry. I'm wondering if you have any comments or any specific knowledge regarding exactly the extent of that. I grew up hand-picking tomatoes and my kids grew up on a machine. My understanding is that most of the production is hand-harvested and forced in China. Do you have any comments specifically on the tomato industry?
196 words
All Tags
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Stephen Brown
  • 04:29:48 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Thank you very much for your question. As many people have heard, we hear anecdotal evidence of some of the practice of slavery happening right now in East Turkestan. In terms of specific data, I don't have any to provide to you right now, but I can follow up with your office afterwards.
54 words
All Tags
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Dave Epp
  • 04:30:11 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Thank you. Regarding the exemption to import prohibition from companies, how would you work with that if COFCO, which happens to be one of the main tomato purchasers in Xinjiang, is a state-owned enterprise?
35 words
All Tags
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Stephen Brown
  • 04:30:28 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
That's an excellent question. It comes back to the main request that we have for amending the bill. I think anything coming out of East Turkestan, any product that's being produced, any business having operations there, should have a responsibility to prove that their products do not contain forced labour. Right now the situation in East Turkestan is such that it only makes sense to assume that everything being produced there is a result of forced labour, and therefore it shouldn't be on the shelves of Canadian grocery stores.
92 words
All Tags
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Dave Epp
  • 04:31:08 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Thank you. In my remaining time, I'd like to go Mr. Thomas, please. Can you talk a little bit more about the impact of threshold for reporting in this legislation, and what are the opportunities to get at the intent of this legislation with companies? I'm thinking about small tomato importers in Canada that might not meet that threshold.
61 words
All Tags
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Kevin Thomas
  • 04:31:26 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
The thresholds are important, because we want to make sure that companies have the capacity to institute due diligence systems. There's no point in asking your corner store to develop that kind of thing just because it's incorporated under the CBCA, so I think those thresholds are appropriate. We've consulted with a lot of businesses in the retail sector, particularly around the thresholds, and we found that they're more or less in the right place. We're not really concerned about that as a problem in the legislation. We are concerned that there's a requirement that there be a due diligence system, and that's the part that we haven't seen in the legislation. So far, there is a reporting requirement, but the answer could simply be no. The key here is making sure that there's a positive obligation to due diligence.
149 words
All Tags
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Mr. Dave Epp
  • 04:32:11 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Read Aloud
Thank you. Thank you, Mr. Chair.
6 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border