SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of Parliament

Larry Brock

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Brantford—Brant
  • Ontario
  • Voting Attendance: 64%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $129,861.80

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 229 - Oct/4/23
Mr. Larry Brock
  • Oct/4/23 5:10:46 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill S-12 
Mr. Speaker, it is all about the supremacy of Parliament. The language in the dissenting report from the Supreme Court of Canada made it abundantly clear that this was the rationale behind the amendments made by Prime Minister Harper in 2011. To reflect upon that, it took the better part of 12 years before there was a successful charter challenge, which made its way all the up to the Supreme Court of Canada. That is quite telling, and I would again encourage my friend and colleague from the NDP to also review the dissenting opinion, because perhaps some of the answers she seeks are found in that opinion.
108 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 229 - Oct/4/23
Mr. Larry Brock
  • Oct/4/23 5:07:10 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill S-12 
Mr. Speaker, my friend has hit the nail on the head. Mandatory training applies not only to judges who clearly need it. Clearly we have judges who do. I need only cite a number of cases from across this country where judges, particularly more experienced judges, have often relied upon some rape myths to try to establish the rationale as to why an individual was acquitted. Too many judges follow through with that trapped line of thinking, which is archaic, which is wrong and which completely revictimizes the victims. As such, training is essential, not only for justices, but Crown attorneys, defence counsel and all participants in the criminal justice system to ensure that victims are treated as fairly as the accused.
122 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 90 - Jun/16/22
Mr. Larry Brock (Brantford—Brant, CPC)
  • Jun/16/22 2:16:04 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-9 
Mr. Speaker, six years ago, in 2016, the government conducted consultations on reforming the judicial complaints process. After inexcusable delays, we are finally starting to debate Bill C-9, which has the potential to increase confidence in the judicial system. This is long overdue. This bill would replace the process through which the conduct of federally appointed judges is reviewed by the Canadian Judicial Council and would enable a judge to be removed from office for reasons including infirmity, misconduct or failure in the due execution of judicial office. By modifying the existing judicial review process, a straightforward process for complaints serious enough to warrant removal from office would be established. Our justice system needed this piece of legislation to be implemented years ago. Canadians must be assured that our judges need to be held accountable and perform their duty in the best interests of our society and our country. I urge all members in the House to support this bill.
161 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border