SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Hon. Andrew Scheer

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of the Board of Internal Economy House leader of the official opposition
  • Conservative
  • Regina—Qu'Appelle
  • Saskatchewan
  • Voting Attendance: 63%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $172,932.98

  • Government Page
  • Oct/31/23 3:21:21 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I want to correct the record. I misspoke during question period and want to make sure my comments are accurate. I said that the Governor of the Bank of Canada testified that the carbon tax added 16% of extra inflation. It is actually 16% of total inflation and 33% of extra inflation above target.
63 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/31/23 9:40:28 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-35 
Madam Speaker, just to clarify, the invitation was to amend the flawed bill that contradicts what the minister just said. The minister has already had lots of time—
29 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/22/23 5:28:55 p.m.
  • Watch
On a point of order, I have a quick question, Mr. Speaker. It has been a while since I occupied the Speaker's chair and oversaw the House administration. I know that the hon. member had a “check for context” label attached to his last week. Does Hansard do that when an hon. member misleads the House?
59 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/17/22 1:25:45 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I want to clarify the record. I misspoke during my questions and comments in regard to the member for Saanich—Gulf Islands. I indicated she was the only member of the House to have been arrested for protesting illegally. I completely forgot the image of the Minister of Environment in his orange jumpsuit. He too was arrested for illegal protests and I—
66 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Feb/16/22 3:19:42 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I want to carry on with the point that was made by my colleague from Thornhill. When comments made in the House are injurious, insulting and unparliamentary, they rise to the level of a question of privilege. As you know, you have the ability to rule on that immediately. I will not even go into the hypocrisy of a man who did blackface so often that he cannot remember it accusing somebody else of doing anything remotely racist. However, his comments made to a Jewish member of the House are beyond unparliamentary. They are reprehensible. I ask that you rule that this rises to the level of a question of privilege. I am prepared to move the appropriate motion.
121 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border