44th Parl. 1st Sess.
September 27, 2022 10:00AM
- Sep/27/22 10:07:13 a.m.
- Watch
I am now ready to rule on the question of privilege raised on September 22, 2022, by the member for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan regarding comments made on social media by a member of the parliamentary press gallery.
In raising his question of privilege, the member for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan explained that after he asked a question during oral questions, a journalist tweeted comments that he considered personally threatening. The member asserted that in the current social climate, these comments could incite some people to violence.
The member further stated that the journalist’s status as an accredited member of the press gallery gives him special access to the parliamentary precinct. In the member’s view, the idea of crossing paths with someone who has threatened him worries him so such that he thinks it would impede his ability to perform his duties.
The House leader of the official opposition and the members for Kildonan—St. Paul and Louis-Saint-Laurent expressed their support for the member’s statement, noting that members are increasingly dealing with similar unacceptable situations.
The Chair takes this situation very seriously. Elected officials are regularly subject to comments on social media that go beyond criticism and political debate. Some comments are sometimes extreme and occasionally even violent.
Parliamentarians, their staff and those who report on parliamentary activities should seek to raise the level of public debate and resist the temptation to trivialize or oversimplify important issues, as it can occur on social media.
In this instance, the Chair will not address issues of security or the threats experienced by elected officials since the Chair’s role, in deliberating on questions of privilege, is limited to determining whether, in light of the facts brought before the House, there is a prima facie breach of privilege and whether this matter should take precedence over all other House business. Therefore, in this case, the Chair will instead seek to determine whether the journalist’s comments about the member were designed to intimidate him and infringe on his ability to perform his parliamentary functions.
Regarding cases where members are obstructed, interfered with or intimidated by non-physical means House of Commons Procedure and Practice, third edition, states the following on page 111: “In ruling on such matters, the Speaker examines the effect the incident or event had on the Member’s ability to fulfill his or her parliamentary responsibilities.”
The Chair has reviewed the statement by the member for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan with these key principles in mind. The facts outlined in the House do not appear to show that the member was impeded in performing his parliamentary functions. Therefore, I cannot find a prima facie question of privilege.
As for the member’s second point, the Chair will not interfere with the rules governing the press gallery. The Chair is convinced that press gallery officials will continue to uphold among its members its usual high standards of professionalism.
Finally, I would like to remind everyone who influences public debate that they have a responsibility to consider the consequences of their remarks and to choose their words judiciously and respectfully.
I thank the members for their attention.
543 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/27/22 2:20:47 p.m.
- Watch
Before continuing, I just want to remind the hon. members that S. O. 31s are 60 seconds, not much more, not much less. I would not want to cut any of them off.
This is very important for every one of us and our ridings. Consider this a gentle reminder.
50 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/27/22 2:57:38 p.m.
- Watch
We started off really well, but I am not sure what happened. I want to remind all members to look at their whips and follow their instructions.
The hon. member for Calgary Centre.
33 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/27/22 3:15:11 p.m.
- Watch
I wish to draw the attention of members to the presence in the gallery of the Hon. Ashni K. Singh, Senior Minister in the Office of the President with Responsibility for Finance of the Cooperative Republic of Guyana.
Some hon. members: Hear, hear!
The Speaker: I would also draw the attention of members to the presence in the gallery of Mr. David Beasley, Executive Director of the World Food Programme.
Some hon. members: Hear, hear!
The Speaker: We have a point of order.
The hon. member for Lac-Saint-Jean.
90 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/27/22 3:16:49 p.m.
- Watch
Order.
The hon. member can continue in two seconds. I think everyone is leaving, and they are talking as they leave. We will wait two seconds.
Now that it is quiet, I would ask the member for Lac‑Saint‑Jean to please continue.
45 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/27/22 3:18:40 p.m.
- Watch
Sometimes in the House we do not always understand what is being said or what is being asked. I would remind members to pay attention to what they are hearing and saying. This is not really a point of order. This is a matter of debate on what was said. I will ask all members to be careful what they say.
61 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/27/22 3:19:34 p.m.
- Watch
I am afraid it is pretty clear that is debate and I will have to shut that one down.
19 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/27/22 3:19:57 p.m.
- Watch
I am afraid I am going to have to cut that off as well. That is more of a debate. I am here to ensure that procedure is followed. What is answered and what is asked is, unfortunately, out of the purview of the Speaker.
45 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Sep/27/22 3:20:28 p.m.
- Watch
The hon. member for Vaughan—Woodbridge has four minutes and 30 seconds remaining in his debate.
17 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
