SoVote

John Brassard

Member of Parliament
Conservative

Barrie—Innisfil
Ontario
Voting Attendance: 68%
Expenses Last Quarter: $99,360.72

Government Page

Context: House Hansard - 281 - Feb/13/24

Mr. John Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil, CPC)

Feb/13/24 2:34:36 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, the question was a simple one really, but after eight years of this NDP-Liberal government, who in this place or across Canada expects a proper response from a Prime Minister who is not worth the cost and not worth the corruption? The AG's report causes a reasonable person to conclude that what happened with the arrive scam app has reached a level of criminality that must be investigated, so I am going to ask again. Will the Prime Minister join Conservatives and call on the RCMP to expand an investigation into the arrive scam app, based on the revelations that were contained in the Auditor General's report?

112 words

Context: House Hansard - 281 - Feb/13/24

Mr. John Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil, CPC)

Feb/13/24 2:33:17 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, the arrive scam app is just like the Prime Minister, not worth the cost and not worth the corruption. The investigation and damning report issued by the Auditor General on ArriveCAN shocked even her. Really, after eight years of this NDP-Liberal government, no one should be shocked by the level of incompetence and wasteful spending that Canadians have seen from this Prime Minister. A reasonable-thinking person could conclude from the report that the arrive scam app issue has reached the level of criminality. Will the Prime Minister join Conservatives and call on the RCMP to expand an investigation into the arrive scam app, based on the revelations in the Auditor General's report?

117 words

Context: House Hansard - 93 - Jun/21/22

Mr. John Brassard

Jun/21/22 3:08:54 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, I do apologize, but this is not drama. This is about direction to a commissioner of the RCMP to actively be involved in a case, an ongoing investigation in Nova Scotia, from the Prime Minister's Office and the then public safety minister's office. That is the accusation that has been made in this case, so this is a serious matter. The police were actively investigating something, and they were being told by the Prime Minister's Office and the public safety minister's office that the commissioner was to interfere. Who told them?

97 words

Context: House Hansard - 93 - Jun/21/22

Mr. John Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil, CPC)

Jun/21/22 2:56:53 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, that is contradictory evidence, according to the commission's report. According to the commanders on the ground, Commissioner Lucki became extremely upset that the commissioners were not releasing the information in an active investigation, despite the fact that the commanders on the ground said they were not willing to do it because it would compromise the investigation. Again, I ask this: Somebody in the Prime Minister's Office and somebody in the public safety minister's office directed Commissioner Lucki to get that information. Who was it?

89 words

Context: House Hansard - 93 - Jun/21/22

Mr. John Brassard (Barrie—Innisfil, CPC)

Jun/21/22 2:55:42 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, this is critical, because, according to the commander's notes in the Mass Casualty Commission report, Commissioner Lucki promised the Prime Minister's Office and the public safety minister's office that they would release the information in an active investigation that she was discussing. It would appear that somebody from the Prime Minister's Office and the public safety minister's office was directing Commissioner Lucki to interfere in an active police investigation, when the investigators on the ground said they did not want to. Who in the PMO and the public safety minister's office directed Commissioner Lucki?

102 words

SoVote

Member of Parliament

John Brassard