SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians

Stéphane Bergeron

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians
  • Bloc Québécois
  • Montarville
  • Quebec
  • Voting Attendance: 59%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $115,582.71

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 243 - Oct/31/23
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron (Montarville, BQ)
  • Oct/31/23 2:47:05 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the minister has announced that tomorrow he intends to do one thing and then do the exact opposite. He announced that he would vote in favour of our motion asking him to consult Quebec before adjusting immigration thresholds, based on integration capacity, and then he is going to do the opposite. He is going to announce the immigration thresholds for 2026 without having consulted Quebec and without having the slightest idea of its integration capacity in terms of health, education, French language training and infrastructure. He is going to vote and then he is immediately going to betray that vote. Why not consult Quebec before announcing immigration thresholds instead?
111 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 36 - Feb/21/22
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron
  • Feb/21/22 7:20:35 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I am not sure I understood my colleague's question. I am not sure what to answer, but I am wondering how the member can claim that the provincial governments were consulted when the provinces are saying they were not. Where was he? Was he hiding in the closet watching as the federal government consulted the provincial governments? The member can say whatever he wants, but the fact is that the act was invoked without the consent of seven of the provinces. I am saying that—
89 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border