SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians

Stéphane Bergeron

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians
  • Bloc Québécois
  • Montarville
  • Quebec
  • Voting Attendance: 58%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $115,582.71

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 243 - Oct/31/23
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron (Montarville, BQ)
  • Oct/31/23 2:47:05 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the minister has announced that tomorrow he intends to do one thing and then do the exact opposite. He announced that he would vote in favour of our motion asking him to consult Quebec before adjusting immigration thresholds, based on integration capacity, and then he is going to do the opposite. He is going to announce the immigration thresholds for 2026 without having consulted Quebec and without having the slightest idea of its integration capacity in terms of health, education, French language training and infrastructure. He is going to vote and then he is immediately going to betray that vote. Why not consult Quebec before announcing immigration thresholds instead?
111 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 172 - Mar/23/23
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron (Montarville, BQ)
  • Mar/23/23 2:57:19 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister was aware of the close ties between his MP and the Chinese consul because CSIS warned him in 2019. He did nothing. Yesterday, Global News reported that this MP allegedly used this relationship to try to influence Beijing so as to benefit the Liberal Party, even if it meant putting two Canadian citizens at risk. The Prime Minister was naive at best, and his MP apparently took advantage of the situation. This completely disqualifies the government from deciding on the rules governing the inquiry into Chinese interference. When will an independent public inquiry be launched? This is urgent.
103 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 172 - Mar/23/23
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron (Montarville, BQ)
  • Mar/23/23 2:55:55 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, Global News is alleging that a Liberal MP advised the Chinese consulate in Toronto to hold off freeing the two Michaels who were imprisoned in China. That in itself is extremely serious, but we also need to be concerned about the fact that the Prime Minister's Office seemingly only learned about this in the media. The Prime Minister was supposedly shocked. Nevertheless, CSIS warned him as early as 2019, even before the member was elected, of the close ties between the MP and the consul general. How is it possible that this MP was able to continue to have free access to the Chinese diplomat?
108 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 36 - Feb/21/22
Mr. Stéphane Bergeron
  • Feb/21/22 7:20:35 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I am not sure I understood my colleague's question. I am not sure what to answer, but I am wondering how the member can claim that the provincial governments were consulted when the provinces are saying they were not. Where was he? Was he hiding in the closet watching as the federal government consulted the provincial governments? The member can say whatever he wants, but the fact is that the act was invoked without the consent of seven of the provinces. I am saying that—
89 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border