SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of Parliament

Rachael Thomas

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Lethbridge
  • Alberta
  • Voting Attendance: 65%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $131,565.29

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 240 - Oct/26/23
Mrs. Rachael Thomas (Lethbridge, CPC)
  • Oct/26/23 2:17:05 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, The Canadian Press was forced to retract three erroneous statements. Surprise, surprise, it had to do with Conservatives, of course, who were wrongly attacked. It should also be noted that persistent legal action was required in order to finally get it to retract its misleading information. In its notice of correction, which was released late at night when nobody was looking, it admitted this: It admitted that the Canadian Press falsely reported one thing but, in fact, an opposite thing was stated by the Leader of the Opposition. Then, it went on to say that, actually, it falsely reported a second thing but, in fact, the exact opposite was true. Then, it went on to admit that it actually falsely reported a third thing in the same story but, in fact, the exact opposite was true. These are three massive errors and not mini mistakes: This is absolute disregard for the truth. The Canadian Press admitted this, but it was deliberate three times. Why did it take legal action to finally get it to correct the record?
179 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 91 - Jun/17/22
Mrs. Rachael Thomas
  • Jun/17/22 10:18:20 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-11 
Madam Speaker, I would like to correct the record. We did not have five weeks of witnesses. That is incredibly misleading, and I would give the hon. member the opportunity to apologize to the House for misleading. We had five days.
41 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 68 - May/10/22
Mrs. Rachael Thomas (Lethbridge, CPC)
  • May/10/22 2:32:14 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-11 
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of Heritage keeps assuring Canadians that Bill C-11 will not interfere with their online viewing choices. Sure, perhaps the bill does not dictate which algorithms have to be used, but it does effectively take control of a person's search bar by determining what content that individual can and cannot access online. Say goodbye to consumer choice and say hello to whatever the government wants to force in front of our eyeballs. The minister will say that I am wrong. He will put on a great show. Why does the minister insist on misleading Canadians?
100 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border