SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 268

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 14, 2023 10:00AM
  • Dec/14/23 1:33:28 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, pursuant to Standing Order 30(6), it is only the government that can bring bills for debate. In her statement on Thursday last week, the government House leader stated that the government would give priority to bills in the House “in their final stages of debate” including Bill— An hon. member: Oh, oh!
58 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/14/23 1:34:10 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-57 
Madam Speaker, the government House leader said that they would give “priority to the bills that are now in their final stages of debate in the House, including Bill C-57”, so you can imagine my surprise—
40 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/14/23 1:34:42 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, it is Standing Order 30(6), which sets out that the government is the only one that can call bills for debate. I have a point of order on that. Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
37 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/14/23 1:35:03 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I have a point of order and then I am going to move a motion.
17 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/14/23 1:35:57 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-57 
Madam Speaker, I am trying to get there, but I keep getting interrupted by members of the Liberal Party. I was saying that only the government can choose bills to come forward for debate. It has stated that Bill C-57 is a bill it urgently wants to be concluded in the House. It has not called it for debate today, so—
63 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/14/23 1:36:28 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I am now going to, assuming that I have the unanimous support of the House, move that, notwithstanding any— Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
27 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/14/23 1:37:01 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I move that, notwithstanding any standing order or usual practice of the House— Some hon. members: No.
20 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/14/23 2:38:14 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, unlike that minister, I actually spoke to farmers from Dufferin today. One farmer, from Burnett Farms, is going to pay $40,000 in carbon taxes this year alone. After this incompetent Liberal-NDP government quadruples the tax, it will be $160,000. They do not need another government program. They need the carbon tax cut. How is this farmer supposed to pay for it? Should farmers cut production or will they have to import food from polluting foreign farms?
81 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/14/23 2:39:30 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, with that statement, this radical carbon tax-loving environment minister has basically proven the point. His carbon tax has not stopped any of the effects on farms. Instead, farmers are left paying this punishing carbon tax. A chicken farm pays $15,000 for one barn this year in carbon tax. After this ideologically obsessed minister quadruples the carbon tax, it will be $60,000 for one chicken barn. What is this farmer supposed to do to pay it, raise prices or force Canadians to import their food from polluting foreign farms?
93 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border