SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 38

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
March 1, 2022 10:00AM
  • Mar/1/22 2:58:09 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, according to Angus Reid, 53% of Canadians cannot keep up with the cost of living, and things are going to get worse. The next budget will introduce significant amounts of new spending and make inflation worse for Canadian families, and on April 1, the government is increasing the carbon tax on gasoline by almost nine cents a litre. Every day, we hear more stories of Canadians telling us they are getting squeezed. When will the government realize it needs to change its course and cancel its tax-and-spending plans?
92 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/1/22 2:59:20 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I asked the Liberals about inflation in Saskatchewan, and the government confirmed the negative impact of inflation on the poverty line throughout my province. In fact, the poverty rate increased 1.2% in Saskatchewan and it is only going to get worse. That means an additional 13,000 people in Saskatchewan are falling into poverty every year, simply because inflation is driving their costs through the roof. Why is the government driving low-income families in Saskatoon West deeper into poverty with its high-spending, high-inflation policies?
90 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/1/22 2:59:53 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we will take no lessons from the Conservatives when it comes to supporting the most vulnerable people in Canada. We introduced the CCB, which is indexed to inflation and lifted almost 300,000 children out of poverty. We increased the GIS, also indexed to inflation, which has helped over 900,000 seniors. In fact, when we formed government, there were 5.1 million Canadians in poverty. By 2019 that figure had dropped to 3.7 million.
78 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Mar/1/22 6:17:57 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, I rise on a point of order. The member for Calgary Forest Lawn used a term the Conservatives came up with a while ago referencing inflation. Although I know they have been using the term repeatedly, and we thought they were going to stop using it, they continue to do so. We know one procedural rule is that we cannot do indirectly what we cannot do directly, and it is very clear that, when they use that term to reference inflation, they are invoking the Prime Minister's first name. As such, I would encourage you to take the opportunity, perhaps, to go back, reflect and come back with a ruling on whether using a term like that does indeed violate the procedural rules we have.
128 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border