SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of Parliament

Shannon Stubbs

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Lakeland
  • Alberta
  • Voting Attendance: 67%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $115,261.63

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 232 - Oct/16/23
Mrs. Shannon Stubbs (Lakeland, CPC)
  • Oct/16/23 1:54:55 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-49 
Madam Speaker, I want to thank my colleague from Nova Scotia for addressing this legislation and for speaking the truth about the negative impacts it would have on both offshore petroleum development and the future of renewable offshore development. I wonder if he would expand on how disastrous it would be to proceed with Bill C-49 now, given that sections from Bill C-69, sections 61, 62 and 64, which are all embedded in Bill C-69, have now been declared by the Supreme Court of Canada, on Friday, to be largely unconstitutional. I wonder if he would expand on exactly the perils of proceeding with this legislation, which they are rushing through on time allocation, given that we would all know that we were passing a bill with significant clauses that are unconstitutional.
135 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 69 - May/11/22
Mrs. Shannon Stubbs (Lakeland, CPC)
  • May/11/22 2:39:30 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the truth is zero pipelines have been proposed or built under the Liberals, and they have killed billions in projects and hundreds of thousands of jobs. The PM ignored experts, workers, indigenous leaders and investors in every province and territory on Bill C-69. The court said it is a “profound invasion” that places a chokehold on provinces. It called it a “wrecking ball” that “smacks of paternalism” and overrides indigenous agreements. It is uncertain, unpredictable, unquantifiable and unreliable, just like Conservatives warned. Therefore, instead of wasting more time and tax dollars to appeal, will he just repeal Bill C-69?
109 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border