SoVote

Martin Champoux

Member of Parliament
Member of Parliament
Bloc Québécois

Drummond
Quebec
Voting Attendance: 67%
Expenses Last Quarter: $108,134.67

Government Page

Context: House Hansard - 202 - May/30/23

May/30/23 1:15:53 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, I commend my colleague from New Westminster—Burnaby for his speech. I also commend the NDP for moving this motion. I think it is very courageous and timely, because the issue is extremely important. What is at stake is democracy and the confidence that Quebeckers and Canadians have in democracy and the functioning of their Parliament. There are several items in this motion, but the most important item for me is the one calling on the Right Hon. David Johnston to step aside and calling on the government to urgently establish a public inquiry. That is what the opposition parties are asking for. I cannot speak for the Conservatives, but the Bloc Québécois will most certainly support this NDP motion. This is a very important motion to which the NDP is also attaching great importance. Will the NDP tell the government that this motion is the condition for its continued support for this government? Is it important enough for the NDP to stick its neck out and tell the government that enough is enough, that its confidence in the government, in their deal and in their alliance will be decided by the vote on this motion?

203 words

Context: House Hansard - 167 - Mar/9/23

Mr. Martin Champoux

Mar/9/23 11:01:27 a.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-11

Mr. Speaker, I thank my hon. colleague from New Westminster—Burnaby for his question. I too really enjoy working with him on the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage. No, I do not see those things. As I said earlier, misinformation is being used to fearmonger regarding issues like freedom of expression and the freedom to surf the web without impediment or constraints. I think this has more to do with bad faith and fearmongering, to serve their own interests. I guess it pays off politically. I confess that I do not resort to spreading disinformation, or at least as little as possible. If I do, it is truly accidental, and I apologize in advance. No, I do not at all see what the Conservatives see in this bill.

129 words

Context: House Hansard - 87 - Jun/13/22

Mr. Martin Champoux

Jun/13/22 7:10:36 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-11

Mr. Speaker, it is a big challenge to give a brief answer. I will try nonetheless. I thank my colleague from New Westminster—Burnaby for his comments and his question. I cannot answer the question about the Conservatives' motives. I believe that it may be ideological obstruction. However, it must be said that these delays in the work on Bill C‑11 have consequences for more than just Bill C‑11. These stalling tactics are causing delays for important bills, such as Bill C‑18, which must soon be referred to the Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage. There are also consequences on other very important studies that we decided to put forward. Unfortunately, I do not have an answer, but I would say that it has consequences for more than just Bill C‑11.

143 words

Context: House Hansard - 69 - May/11/22

Mr. Martin Champoux

May/11/22 10:47:29 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-11

Madam Speaker, there is no doubt that you are doing an excellent job. Respectfully, our colleague from New Westminster—Burnaby just gave a speech and we would have liked to have asked him some questions. Just two questions were asked. Perhaps the questions and the answers were a bit long, but I would have liked for a third party to at least have the opportunity to ask a question. I wanted to mention this for future consideration.

78 words

All Topics

SoVote

Member of Parliament

Martin Champoux