SoVote

Michelle Ferreri

Member of Parliament
Member of Parliament
Conservative

Peterborough—Kawartha
Ontario
Voting Attendance: 67%
Expenses Last Quarter: $106,196.43

Government Page

Ms. Michelle Ferreri (Peterborough—Kawartha, CPC)

Jun/3/24 3:30:18 p.m.
Watch

Mr. Speaker, I rise today to present the dissenting report that the Conservatives are tabling on behalf of what we call the “Supporting Women's Economic Empowerment in Canada” study done in the Standing Committee on the Status of Women. This is a seven-page dissenting report that we feel is important to put forward, because some of these points were not covered well in the study. There are four main points that we have put into the dissenting report, because one of the key messages that was overlooked throughout this study was the access to affordable, quality child care. In 2021, when the Government of Canada rolled out its national early learning and child care program, one of the fundamental pillars it presented was making it easier for women to return to the labour force. However, as we heard continuously throughout testimony during this study, it is quite the contrary. Here is what we heard throughout the study. Women entrepreneurs are being targeted for extinction with no room for private representation; child care operators are closing their doors; parents have lack of choice and face long wait lists; and women's participation in the labour force is declining. I will conclude with the following, “Canada's child care entrepreneurs are asking...whether they have a place in Canada's national child care program or a future in child care at all.” “It's to the detriment of all women that child care entrepreneurs are being targeted for extinction through the nationalization of Canada's child care sector.” Those are quotes from one of the witnesses, Andrea Hannen.

274 words

Context: House Hansard - 288 - Feb/29/24

Ms. Michelle Ferreri (Peterborough—Kawartha, CPC)

Feb/29/24 4:12:02 p.m.
Watch

Madam Speaker, there is absolutely no doubt that access to child care is the number one issue in supporting mothers getting back to work or choosing to work outside of the home. There are a couple of things I want to correct on the record. This bill is already in effect. It is already happening. These agreements have already been signed. What we are arguing and debating today in the House are two amendments that were put through the Senate that Conservatives supported but the Liberals did not, and now we are here. My question to the member opposite is this. If one cannot access child care, then what is it? What we do know is what has come out of Stats Canada. Under this $10-a-day child care, 77% of high-income parents are accessing it under this Liberal program, versus 41% of low-income families. Does he support that?

152 words

Context: House Hansard - 288 - Feb/29/24

Ms. Michelle Ferreri (Peterborough—Kawartha, CPC)

Feb/29/24 1:41:12 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-35

Mr. Speaker, I would ask my colleague to speak with her colleague about what we fought for in committee. The Conservatives were the only ones who put forward and supported an amendment for UNDRIP to ensure that first nations had access to their own child care rights. The initial version of Bill C-35 made no reference to official language minority communities. The Conservative amendments were introduced during the clause-by-clause review by the HUMA committee and they were voted down by the Liberals, which the NDP supported. Therefore, I would ask the member to say that the Conservatives have been the only ones standing for families and parents, including indigenous peoples and first nations, to do what they feel is best with their children and to give them the choice. Therefore, why are New Democrats supporting the Liberals?

140 words

Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23

Ms. Michelle Ferreri

Jun/14/23 8:50:02 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-35

Madam Speaker, I am not sure why the member is telling the House that Conservatives are not supporting this bill. That is not true.

24 words

All Topics

Context: House Hansard - 213 - Jun/14/23

Ms. Michelle Ferreri

Jun/14/23 8:12:25 p.m.
Watch
Re: Bill C-35

Madam Speaker, my colleague is a fierce advocate and mom who has had two kids during Parliament. She has a wealth of knowledge. She also lives in a child care desert of Saskatchewan and knows wholeheartedly the real struggle of this. She sat on the HUMA committee with me. I would love to tell the House something great. I would love to look into the camera and tell everybody at home that there is some great reason why they would do that. At the end of the day, it was because Conservatives put it forward. They have created some narrative that Conservatives hate child care. That is what they love to tell people. The reality is that most of us women on this side are moms, too. We are not pitted against other women in this House. We are supporting everyone. We support women who breastfed for the first time. To the minister opposite, I say good for her. We support women and men of the NDP bringing their babies in here. We support everybody. That is what we are trying to say, over and over again. That is why we are trying to elevate the voices of all the people who are ringing the alarm bells. Why did the NDP and the Liberals vote it down? The member would have to ask them.

224 words

SoVote

Member of Parliament

Michelle Ferreri