SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of Parliament

Michelle Ferreri

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Peterborough—Kawartha
  • Ontario
  • Voting Attendance: 66%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $106,196.43

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 316 - May/23/24
Ms. Michelle Ferreri
  • May/23/24 8:56:56 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, they were called to do a review in 2020 on behalf of victims everywhere. What a shameful representation from the Minister of Justice that this Canadian Victims Bill of Rights has never been reviewed. I ask the minister today, he is the Minister of Justice, to name the four issues that have been asked to be reviewed, because in this country, criminals have more rights than victims. What are they? Please tell the victims watching.
77 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 316 - May/23/24
Ms. Michelle Ferreri
  • May/23/24 8:56:02 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Chair, how many years ago did he promise to enforce and to review the Canadian Victims Bill of Rights?
20 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 309 - May/6/24
Ms. Michelle Ferreri
  • May/6/24 8:05:51 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, what a question coming from a man. I would love him to tell me what to do with my uterus. That is great. That member will never tell me what to do with my body. We know the Liberals are losing really bad when they bring up abortion. We will never bring this up. If the member opposite wants to talk about my reproductive rights, he had better put a woman up and stop mansplaining to me. Some hon. members: Oh, oh!
84 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 288 - Feb/29/24
Ms. Michelle Ferreri (Peterborough—Kawartha, CPC)
  • Feb/29/24 1:41:12 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-35 
Mr. Speaker, I would ask my colleague to speak with her colleague about what we fought for in committee. The Conservatives were the only ones who put forward and supported an amendment for UNDRIP to ensure that first nations had access to their own child care rights. The initial version of Bill C-35 made no reference to official language minority communities. The Conservative amendments were introduced during the clause-by-clause review by the HUMA committee and they were voted down by the Liberals, which the NDP supported. Therefore, I would ask the member to say that the Conservatives have been the only ones standing for families and parents, including indigenous peoples and first nations, to do what they feel is best with their children and to give them the choice. Therefore, why are New Democrats supporting the Liberals?
140 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 282 - Feb/14/24
Ms. Michelle Ferreri (Peterborough—Kawartha, CPC)
  • Feb/14/24 6:04:41 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I had an excellent time working with my colleague on this bill. I have two things. Number one, does the member think it was worthwhile for the federal government to interfere in provincial jurisdiction when this is a provincial matter? Number two, the Liberals turned these amendments down. These are in the Charter of Rights. These are about official languages and encouraging funding for French and minority languages. Why does the member believe the Liberals did not want to support that, especially in committee, and are changing their minds now?
92 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border