SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Ontario Bill 162

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
April 25, 2024
  • Bill 162, titled the Protecting Against Carbon Taxes Act, 2024, is an act that aims to prevent the establishment of carbon pricing programs without the authorization of a referendum. It also restricts the authority of the Executive Council to establish such programs without referendum authorization. The act includes provisions for the referendum question, the referendum process, campaign regulations, and penalties for non-compliance. Additionally, the act prohibits the charging of tolls on highways unless authorized by an Act. The act will come into force upon receiving Royal Assent.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • The steelman argument in favor of Bill 162 2024, the Protecting Against Carbon Taxes Act, is that it provides a democratic and transparent process for determining the implementation of carbon pricing programs in Ontario. By requiring a referendum before the establishment of a carbon pricing program, the Act ensures that the decision is made by the people of Ontario rather than by the government alone. This allows for a broader and more inclusive discussion on the issue, giving citizens the opportunity to voice their opinions and concerns. Furthermore, the Act sets clear criteria for the referendum question, ensuring that it is clear, concise, and impartial. This helps to prevent any bias or manipulation in the wording of the question, ensuring a fair and unbiased referendum process. The Act also includes provisions for campaign registration and regulation, ensuring that campaign organizers and contributors are accountable and transparent in their activities. This helps to prevent undue influence or manipulation of the referendum process by special interest groups. Overall, the Act promotes democratic decision-making and transparency in the implementation of carbon pricing programs, allowing the people of Ontario to have a direct say in the matter. It ensures that the decision is made in a fair and inclusive manner, taking into account the diverse perspectives and interests of the population.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument: Opposing Bill 162 2024: Protecting Against Carbon Taxes Act Introduction: Bill 162 2024, also known as the Protecting Against Carbon Taxes Act, aims to enact measures to protect Ontario's economy from the high cost of a provincial carbon tax. While the intention behind this bill may seem noble, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences and infringements on individual liberties that it may bring. This steelman argument will present the opposing viewpoint to Bill 162 2024, using right-wing anti-government talking points. 1. Limited Government Intervention: Right-wing ideology emphasizes limited government intervention in the economy. Bill 162 2024, by enacting measures to protect against carbon taxes, expands the role of the government in regulating and controlling economic activities. This goes against the principles of free-market capitalism and individual freedom. 2. Economic Prosperity: Right-wing ideology promotes policies that support economic prosperity and job creation. By protecting against carbon taxes, Bill 162 2024 may hinder economic growth and job opportunities in Ontario. Carbon taxes can act as incentives for businesses to invest in cleaner technologies and reduce their carbon emissions. By limiting the implementation of carbon pricing programs, the government may be hindering the transition to a greener economy and potentially missing out on economic opportunities. 3. Individual Freedom and Choice: Right-wing ideology values individual freedom and choice. Bill 162 2024 restricts the ability of individuals and businesses to make their own decisions regarding carbon emissions. It imposes regulations and potentially limits the choices available to consumers and businesses. This infringes upon individual liberties and interferes with the free market. 4. Government Overreach: Right-wing ideology emphasizes limited government intervention and opposes excessive government control. Bill 162 2024 expands the authority of the government to regulate and impose restrictions on carbon pricing programs. This can be seen as an overreach of government power and an infringement on the rights of individuals and businesses to make their own decisions. 5. Cost of Implementation: Right-wing ideology emphasizes fiscal responsibility and limited government spending. Implementing and enforcing the measures outlined in Bill 162 2024 may require significant financial resources. This could result in increased government spending and potentially lead to higher taxes or increased government debt, which goes against the principles of fiscal conservatism. Conclusion: While Bill 162 2024 aims to protect against the high cost of carbon taxes, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences and infringements on individual liberties that it
  • April 25, 2024, noon
  • In Progress
  • Read

Assembly Debates

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
April 25, 2024
  • April 15, 2024, noon
  • Passed

Assembly Debates

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
March 07, 2024

Assembly Debates

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
March 06, 2024

Assembly Debates

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
March 05, 2024

Assembly Debates

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
February 29, 2024

Assembly Debates

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
February 28, 2024
  • Feb. 20, 2024, noon
  • Passed