SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Bill

Bill C-302

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
October 27, 2022
An Act to amend the Canada Labour Code (replacement workers)
  • Bill C-302 is a proposed law that would amend the Canada Labour Code. It aims to make it illegal for employers to use replacement workers to do the jobs of employees who are on strike or locked out. The bill outlines the conditions under which a replacement worker can be used, such as to prevent harm to people or property. The bill also includes provisions for investigating and penalties for employers who violate the law.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • Steelman Argument: This Act seeks to protect the rights of employees who are on strike or locked out by prohibiting the use of replacement workers to perform their duties. The intention behind this prohibition is to prevent employers from undermining the bargaining power of employees in these situations and to encourage productive negotiations between employers and employees. One argument in favor of this Act is that it levels the playing field between employers and employees during a strike or lockout. By prohibiting the use of replacement workers, employers are not able to continue operations as if there were no labor dispute, which can put pressure on employees to settle for less favorable terms. This allows employees to exercise their right to strike or be locked out without fear of being easily replaced, strengthening their position in negotiations. Proponents of this Act argue that it promotes fair bargaining practices by encou

SteelmanSpren Against

  • The amendment to the Canada Labour Code, Bill C-302, which makes it an offence for employers to use replacement workers during strikes or lockouts, is a violation of the rights of employers and restricts their ability to manage their businesses effectively. Firstly, employers have the right to manage their businesses in a way that ensures their survival and success. The use of replacement workers during strikes or lockouts allows employers to continue operations and prevent significant losses or disruptions to their business. By criminalizing the use of replacement workers, employers are being unfairly restricted in their ability to protect their interests and ensure the viability of their companies. Furthermore, the amendment interferes with the freedom of contract between employers and employees. Collective bargaining is a process that should allow both parties to negotiate and reach an agreement that satisfies their respective ne
House First Reading
  • Oct. 27, 2022, 10 a.m.
  • In Progress
  • Read