SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 301

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 17, 2024 02:00PM
  • Apr/17/24 5:33:45 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, just to be clear, Mr. Firth has not had any private conversations, at any point, with any member of Parliament over the period of the committee hearings. I am not talking about at the committees themselves; I am talking about private conversations, hallway conversations, phone calls or anything of that nature.
53 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:34:06 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I have not.
5 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:34:12 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we have not seen a scandal like this since the ETS scandal under the Harper government. The ETS scandal cost Canadian taxpayers $400 million. The Conservatives had a majority government at the time. The Conservatives did everything they could to keep Canadians from getting the answers they were looking for. This Conservative scandal was never resolved and we never got the information. However, this time, since we have a minority Parliament, we are getting answers about the ArriveCAN scandal. That is extremely important. It is because of the parliamentary powers we have. As we saw under the Harper regime, with a majority government, it was not possible to get answers about the $400 million the Conservatives had spent without any transparency at all, but today, we have the opportunity to get more answers, and I think that is important. If I understood correctly, Mr. Firth stated earlier that he only influenced three things in the 220 requirements of the contracts. Is he saying that he did not influence the contract, or is he saying that he did not influence the contract as much as is being claimed?
192 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:36:01 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the answer is correct to both of those. I had no influence at all on the contract award, and I had no influence on the ArriveCAN scandal.
29 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:36:14 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, Mr. Firth mentioned earlier that he did in fact falsify or alter the résumés. According to what we heard in committee, one person was said to have 13 years of experience, when that was not true. Other information about these people was also falsified. I want to ask two questions. First, does Mr. Firth regret the fact that those résumés were falsified? Second, to date, the federal government has not asked for the questionable amounts to be repaid. Is Mr. Firth prepared to reimburse Canadian taxpayers for the questionable amounts of these contracts?
106 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:37:17 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Botler contract was in no way related to the ArriveCAN application. Furthermore, I made a margin of zero dollars on the Botler opportunity.
26 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:37:44 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the opportunity to participate in this historic, unprecedented occasion. I would like to put this question to Mr. Firth. I know he will not have them with him at the moment, but will he provide to Parliament and the operations committee the full list of all website domains that he has registered or requested to be registered in pursuit of his business as an IT staffing firm?
71 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:38:19 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, yes, I can do that.
7 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:38:25 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to review some of the answers that Mr. Firth gave earlier today. To the hon. member for Skeena—Bulkley Valley, when asked if he would have liked to have answered differently when he thinks back and reflects on his answers to committee, his answer was that he wished he could have answered more concisely. I would like to put it to the witness that no one has accused him of answers that were verbose. He has been accused of answering, and found to have answered, in ways ways that were evasive and dishonest. Would he like to amend his answer to say he wishes he had answered honestly in the first instance?
118 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:39:09 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, again, as a result of the admonishment, I see there are a lot of mistakes I have made. That is why I am here, so the answer would be yes.
32 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:39:21 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, in response to questions from the hon. member for Mégantic—L'Érable, Mr. Firth similarly had said earlier today, “I made mistakes”. Is it correct to say that, when the witness says “I made mistakes”, he is acknowledging that he behaved in ways that amounted to a contempt of Parliament by being deliberately misleading, evasive and dishonest? I would suggest that most Canadians would not consider these to be mistakes, but deliberate efforts to mislead Parliament.
86 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:40:02 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, they were mistakes. I have a lot of respect for this, and this was not to be deliberately misleading.
21 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:40:10 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like, in the last few moments we have here with the witness, to put myself in the position of a Canadian watching this on television, and wondering how this could happen. I think it is clear on a factual basis, and respecting this place and everyone in it, that there has been here, in this example, as the Auditor General has found and as the ombudsman has found, an appalling failure of our procurement process. It is completely unacceptable, and the individuals involved at GC Strategies, particularly Mr. Firth and his partner, have benefited personally from what can best be described as extremely dodgy business practices. I would like to ask, on behalf of the people of Canada, an obvious question. I am not suggesting there is an answer, but I would like to ask Mr. Firth if he is a member of any political party. Does he donate to any particular party? Has he been involved in currying favour with any party or political parties in this country?
173 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:41:23 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, no, I have not.
6 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:41:28 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I am pursuing evidence that the witness gave to the government operations committee on October 20. It is a very interesting skill set that the witness has, to obtain these various contracts. Mr. Firth said, “between my business partner Darren and me, we have 30 years of experience dealing with IT companies, whether we are dealing with independent consultants or we have had the luxury of dealing with true subject matter firms.... [We] build a network in which we know the people”. Is it the case that the business experience that gained him millions of dollars, to his personal benefit, amounts to him having an extensive Rolodex of people in the Ottawa area whom he entertains?
120 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:42:24 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, it has afforded us the luxury of having a large Rolodex of resources we can use and get them contracts from the federal government.
26 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:42:40 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, given the experience here, and knowing that the witness has health challenges, all I can ask is this: Is he not ashamed?
24 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:42:55 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, do I have to answer that?
8 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:42:59 p.m.
  • Watch
Yes, you do.
3 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:43:01 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I am not ashamed.
6 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border