SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 301

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 17, 2024 02:00PM
  • Apr/17/24 5:29:18 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, is it possible that when emoluments are given after a contract, they are given before another contract?
19 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:29:29 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I believe it would be before another contract, but that does not mean it is for me.
19 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:29:59 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, if I may, I will draw a conclusion based on what we have heard today. There is nothing unusual in having the Canada Border Services Agency do business with GC Strategies and give it $19 million, without ascertaining that GC Strategies' employees have any exceptional skills or the skills needed to obtain or disclose a contract. We also have to consider it acceptable for public servants to receive gifts, although it is unclear whether this occurs before or after the contracts are awarded. We also have to accept that GC Strategies helps draft calls for tenders because the Canada Border Services Agency lacks the skill to identify its own needs and criteria when it comes to developing calls for tenders. That is very disturbing. We are being asked to believe that paying someone $84,000 for nothing is normal. The witness actually said that he had not done anything to earn this $84,000, but that it was normal. Now people are wondering whose fault it is. Perhaps the Canada Border Services Agency is to blame. This may be the tip of the iceberg, but it is not normal. The Auditor General noted that it was the worst record-keeping she had ever seen. That is not normal. Now the Canada Border Services Agency is working on an import registration system, known as CARM. The House of Commons committee has found a number of irregularities. It is worrisome that this agency is continuing its work after what we have heard today. Let us focus more on the Canada Border Services Agency and the government's responsibility to ensure that that agency is put under third-party management and that steps are taken to recover the taxpayer money that was spent for reasons we do not understand.
298 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:36:01 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the answer is correct to both of those. I had no influence at all on the contract award, and I had no influence on the ArriveCAN scandal.
29 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Apr/17/24 5:37:17 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Botler contract was in no way related to the ArriveCAN application. Furthermore, I made a margin of zero dollars on the Botler opportunity.
26 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border