SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 299

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 15, 2024 11:00AM
Context: House Hansard - 299 - Apr/15/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes)
  • Apr/15/24 12:53:49 p.m.
  • Watch
The amendment is in order. Question and comments, the Parliamentary Secretary to the Minister of Environment and Climate Change and to the Minister of Energy and Natural Resources.
28 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 299 - Apr/15/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès)
  • Apr/15/24 3:56:58 p.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member knows there is a lot of latitude on relevance. The hon. member has 20 minutes for his speech, and there is lots of time to get there. The hon. parliamentary secretary.
34 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 299 - Apr/15/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès)
  • Apr/15/24 4:24:17 p.m.
  • Watch
I need to give the hon. parliamentary secretary a few seconds to answer.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 299 - Apr/15/24
The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Alexandra Mendès)
  • Apr/15/24 4:39:52 p.m.
  • Watch
It is my duty pursuant to Standing Order 38 to inform the House that the questions to be raised tonight at the time of adjournment are as follows: the hon. member for Leeds—Grenville—Thousand Islands and Rideau Lakes, Public Services and Procurement; the hon. member for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan, Public Services and Procurement; and the hon. member for Yellowhead, Carbon Pricing. I believe that the hon. parliamentary secretary to the government House leader is riding on a point of order.
85 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 299 - Apr/15/24
Mr. Garnett Genuis
  • Apr/15/24 8:06:58 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the question was not about the frontline workers. It was about the costly criminal corruption that has become commonplace under the NDP-Liberal government. Kristian Firth, who will be hauled before the bar of this chamber and forced to answer questions on Wednesday, admitted previously, before a committee, that it was systematically part of his process to doctor the résumés of those doing the work before submitting them to the government. The government's favoured contractor, the person who it rigged the process to benefit, admitted to systematically altering résumés. This is not about all the other points of misdirection that the parliamentary secretary is trying to serve up in the House. This is about the question of corruption in procurement and why the government was intentionally designing processes to direct contracts to its friends who engage in such corrupt practices. Why did the parliamentary secretary and his government constantly favour GC Strategies?
163 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border