44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 11, 2024 10:00AM
- Apr/11/24 11:09:31 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 7 to 10 on page 5 with the following:
“net-zero emissions. (économie carboneutre)”
30 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:09:31 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 2, be amended by replacing lines 27 to 29 on page 5 with the following:
“decent work, namely work that can support the work-”
33 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:11:07 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing lines 5 and 6 on page 7 with the following:
“ments of the provinces and territories and Indigenous governments in Canada in relation to the Sustainable”
40 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:11:07 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 7, be amended by replacing line 26 on page 6 with the following:
“tainable jobs;”
24 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:11:07 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 6, be amended by replacing lines 13 and 14 on page 6 with the following:
“eral-territorial initiatives; and”
28 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:24:40 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 24 and 25 on page 11 with the following:
“ments in Canada in relation to the Plan;”
32 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:24:40 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 2 to 4 on page 11 with the following:
“and that was used in the development of the Plan, along with a description of how”
40 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:24:40 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing line 30 on page 11 with the following:
“tribute to the creation and retention of sustainable jobs and to sup-”
34 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:24:40 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 16, be amended by replacing lines 14 to 16 on page 11 with the following:
“skills development, training and retraining;”
29 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:35:45 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by deleting lines 12 to 15 on page 12.
19 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:35:45 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 18, be amended by replacing line 17 on page 12 with the following:
“ritories, Indigenous peoples and any other ex-”
29 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:35:45 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
That Bill C-50, in Clause 19, be amended by replacing line 32 on page 12 with the following:
“of any additional measures that are being tak-”
30 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 11:41:05 a.m.
- Watch
moved:
Que le projet de loi C-50, à l'article 20, soit modifié par suppression des lignes 31 à 35, page 13.
24 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 12:27:20 p.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, it is a privilege today to rise to speak to Bill C-50. I have spoken to it before. As well, I sit on the natural resources committee, and this is a bill that we studied. We heard a lot of testimony from different folks with all aspects of concern for and support of the bill. I plan to use my time this afternoon to make my case as to why this legislation is bad for Canadians and show the correlation between this bill and the carbon tax.
I will address the legislation directly, but I will take a bit of a roundabout way to get there, so I ask for the Chair's indulgence to do that.
Only the Liberal government would have the audacity to put forward this piece of legislation and call it a “sustainable jobs” plan. Bill C-50 is simply a rebranding of the Liberals’ so-called “just transition”, a plan that would shut down Canada’s energy sector and move to what they claim will be a more green, sustainable and just economy.
The Liberals could not sell it under that name. Nobody was buying it. Now, just like a shifty used car salesman, they have slipped on a new coat of paint and jacked up the price. It seems that the Liberals’ new approach to legislation is to title their bills to say the exact opposite of what they are actually going to do because, to date, the government has failed spectacularly at meeting one single environmental target.
The Liberals love to talk about the environment, but their first act in office was to authorize the City of Montreal to dump eight billion litres of raw sewage into the St. Lawrence River. I think most Canadians would call that making pollution free again. Their promise to plant two billion trees never materialized. The said it would be two billion tree over 10 years. They have now had eight years. The time is nearly up, yet how many have they managed to plant? What percentage of those trees are in the ground after eight years? It is 0.05 of 1%, which is not even 1%.
They keep talking about net zero, and it is all over this bill, but the government has yet to meet a single emissions reduction target. It keeps upping what it says it will achieve, when it has not met a single target of it should have achieved.
Again, the government talks a big game, but it does not execute. Across the board, whether it is the economy, immigration, getting a passport or something as simple as sticking a sapling in the ground, it just cannot get the job done.
If we are going to talk about the environment failures, we need look no further than the carbon tax. The Liberal, NDP, and now the Bloc, carbon tax continues to drive inflation and drive up the cost of living for struggling Canadians because the carbon tax is a tax on everything.
The only thing, it seems, that remains unaffected by the Prime Minister’s beloved carbon tax is the environment. That the carbon tax has made little to no difference to the environment should not surprise us. The whole thing is a scam. It is another smoke-and-mirrors sales job, just like its “just transition” to cover up the government’s actual goal, which is its real agenda, the one thing that it has so far been successful at achieving, which is the redistribution of wealth.
That is what the carbon tax is all about. It is what a significant portion of its COVID policies were all about, and that is what this legislation is about. It is a classical Marxist redistribution of wealth.
Members can remember that day a while back when the Minister of the Environment got up in the House to proudly proclaim that he was a socialist, and all the Liberals around him applauded.
It was shocking, not just because of the dark and bloody history associated with such regimes, but also because a Liberal minister actually got up and told the truth about what they were doing. That is what this legislation is about. It is about the government picking winners and losers based on a warped ideology and redistributing wealth and opportunity to those it deems worthy. As retired General Rick Hillier put it just this week, “Ideology masking as leadership killed the Canadian dream.”
Before they start to claim that this is some far right MAGA conspiracy, I would point my colleagues to an excellent article written by Dr. Vijay Kolinjivadi. He is a post-doctoral fellow at the Institute of Development Policy at the University of Antwerp, an expert in the social and economic ramifications of climate change. Dr. Kolinjivadi is a firm believer that climate change is an existential threat. He says that we western governments are “'greening' ourselves to extinction”.
What Dr. Kolinjivadi means by that, and he makes a very convincing case for it, is that the so-called green policies of this and other western governments, or what he calls “fake” solutions, not only do nothing to stop climate change but are in fact a smoke-and-mirrors job to help governments and wealthy investors get even richer off the backs of the middle class and the poorest, most vulnerable, people on our planet. That is what he meant when he said that we are “'greening' ourselves to extinction.”
He is not alone. There is a growing recognition across the political spectrum that what these governments are doing, what our government is doing with these policies, is about wealth redistribution and not the environment. How do they do it? They do it by destroying the middle class. How did they do that? Members can look no further than the effect its COVID and environmental policies have had on our economy in just the last three years.
Can Canadians, particularly those would be the most affected by this legislation, Bill C-50, trust the Liberal government to transition them in a just and sustainable way? I think not, but I like to judge a person by what they do and not what they say. That brings me back to the carbon tax.
Let us look at the three main government talking points about the carbon tax. The first is that the carbon tax is putting a price on pollution. This is false. Eight billion litres of raw sewage went into the St. Lawrence River, and there was no price on pollution there. The carbon tax has made no demonstrable change to emissions, and no targets have been met, nor will they be, at least not from the carbon tax.
Those on the political left say that the tax is too low to force people to modify their behaviour. They complain that it leaves exemptions for large emitters, which it does. Those on the right are equally correct that taxing carbon in Canada is virtue signalling at best as Canada accounts for a mere 1.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions. That means that, if we were to shut down every single carbon-producing thing here in Canada, shut our whole economy down, we would make a whopping difference of 1.5% globally. In questioning the sanity of ignoring actual pollution while taxing a life-enhancing element of the very air we breathe, now, with Bill C-50, Liberals want to spend billions more of taxpayers' dollars to shut down not only the largest private sector driver of our economy but also the largest private sector driver of green and renewable technology as well.
The second talking point is that eight out of 10 Canadian families will receive more money back in rebates than they paid into it. That is false. Rex Murphy pointed out, in his excellent piece in the National Post:
Name a tax that makes the taxpayer richer. What a strange incentive that would be. Half of Canada would be upping the thermostat, putting the air conditioner on in winter, and driving day and night to burn up oil and gas so that they could get more back than they put in.
As the PBO has made clear, one is not getting more money back, and hardly anyone is. In fact, by the time the tax is fully implemented in 2030, eight out of 10 households will pay exponentially more, which is a fact even our proud socialist environment minister has admitted to. No tax makes the taxpayer richer. It only makes the government richer, which leads to the third claim.
The third talking point the Liberals have about the carbon tax is that it is revenue-neutral. This is false. Even if we were to believe the principle that the taxes collected all go toward rebates, which makes no sense, the Liberals are charging GST on top of the carbon tax, and that goes directly into the government’s coffers. We have learned recently that it is holding back billions of dollars collected by the GST on the carbon tax.
All three talking points are demonstrably false. By the way, the Liberals love to repeat their talking points, but one we have not heard in a while is that they are supporting the middle class and those working hard to join it. I guess that has changed.
However, what is true is that this tax, like so many others, is costing Canadians more money at a time when most cannot afford it, and despite its obvious failures, the Liberals continue to double down on this failed policy. Why is that? It is because it is successful in one metric, and one metric only, which is the redistribution of wealth.
It is to the destruction of the middle class to make more money for billionaires and Liberal insiders and to force more everyday Canadians into total reliance on government. This bill, Bill C-50, would do the exact same thing. It is just the next step in the plan. The Liberals’ so-called sustainable jobs plan would actually kill 170,000 Canadian middle-class jobs, displace 450,000 middle-class workers and risk the livelihoods of 2.7 million Canadians.
In short, the Liberal government's just transition is anything but just, and its sustainable jobs plan is anything but sustainable. When those jobs have gone, as they were during COVID, when everyone but the giant billionaire chains were shut down, where else will people turn to but the government?
1778 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 12:38:22 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I do not know what else we would do with fossil fuel energy other than burn it. I suppose plastics and rubber could be made out of it. That would be certainly useful and seems to be working. However, there is a ban on plastics.
I have said before, here and at committee, that when I go to McDonald's or Burger King, and try to slurp up their super thick strawberry milkshakes, their paper straws collapse. That frustrates me to no end, it is true.
The member raised a good point as it allows me to, again, indicate that Canada's oil and gas industry is the biggest contributor, the biggest researcher and developer of renewable energy. That has been proven. The industry has shown that. The industry is looking to green things up as much as it can as well and to be environmentally responsible.
149 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 12:40:06 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, similar to how I answered the previous member's question, the oil and gas industry is doing lots of research and development into transitioning to other energy sources that contribute less CO. When we allow something to naturally transform, and when the economies actually make sense in terms of producing energy in an alternative method, it will happen. It should not require government influence.
This bill would require billions of federal taxpayer dollars to be successful, and we will have to subsidize those sustainable jobs. It really is what the government called it initially: At best, it is a transition bill.
103 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 12:41:36 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, if the member is concerned about job growth and the economy growing in Calgary, the oil and gas industry in Alberta has proven that it has excellent corporate citizens. It has been the best thing that ever happened to the Alberta economy.
If the government were to wilfully shut that industry down, displace 450,000 workers and put 2.7 million people at risk, that would not be very prudent at all.
74 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Apr/11/24 12:43:09 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I will reiterate what the member for Saanich—Gulf Islands said: This bill would accomplish absolutely nothing, and the Liberals are talking out of both sides of their mouths.
32 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
