SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 205

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 2, 2023 10:00AM
  • Jun/2/23 10:09:49 a.m.
  • Watch
We also have the hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South. Is it on this same point of order, or is it a different point of order? Mr. Philip Lawrence: It is a different point of order. The Assistant Deputy Speaker (Mrs. Carol Hughes): That is perfect. Based on past practice, as the parliamentary secretary has mentioned, it is customary for the member of Parliament who wishes to raise issues such as this one to be in touch with the Speaker first, before bringing it to the House. I will just let the hon. member for Calgary Forest Lawn briefly finish up his point of order, and we will then go from there.
113 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:14:53 a.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South has a point of order.
13 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:16:40 a.m.
  • Watch
I am going to cut the hon. member off there. Those are arguments that need to be made, and the hon. member has not heard the decision yet. I will end this point of order here, and I will take under advisement the information the member has already provided, until such time as I render a decision. Then the hon. member will be able to comment on it if he wants to. However, to bypass the procedure and to argue on something he anticipates is either being put forward or not being put forward is not the proper process. The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South has a point of order.
112 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:19:38 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, it was actually a point of order on the process for raising points of order during points of order. This member has, on multiple occasions, interrupted a point of order. When another member is raising and explaining a matter of order, his point of order should not take precedence over an existing point of order on the floor. I think he has also failed to take note of the fact that the member for Northumberland—Peterborough South's point of order was distinct from the point of order raised by the member for Calgary Forest Lawn. His objection may have had some relation to the previous point of order, but it does not have any relation to the one currently being raised.
125 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:20:26 a.m.
  • Watch
I have not heard enough of the point of order from the hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South to determine whether it is in order, so if we can allow him to elaborate. It is different from the previous point of order. This is more about regrouping. Again, it seems to border on a decision that has not been rendered yet. I will just double check that by allowing him to elaborate a little bit more on his point of order before I indicate whether I will allow him to go even further. The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South.
102 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:21:35 a.m.
  • Watch
Some of what the hon. member is bringing up is debate. I would just ask him to get to his point of order without bringing debates into the matter. The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South.
37 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:26:08 a.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South wants to weigh in on the point of order again.
18 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:38:29 a.m.
  • Watch
The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South is rising on a point of order.
15 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:48:10 a.m.
  • Watch
We have quorum. The hon. member for Sherwood Park—Fort Saskatchewan is on the right track and is being succinct with his points of order. I would ask him to finish up. The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South is rising on a point of order.
48 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:48:48 a.m.
  • Watch
I am not entertaining such points of order. The only thing that is required is for hon. members to have a jacket and tie when they are speaking. Is the hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South rising on the same point of order?
44 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 10:58:55 a.m.
  • Watch
I will go to the point of order first. The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South
17 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 11:39:37 a.m.
  • Watch
I must interrupt the member for a point of order. I think it has to to with the interpretation. Can the hon. member for Northumberland-Peterborough South confirm whether it is working now?
33 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 12:21:01 p.m.
  • Watch
I am already hearing noes, so there is no unanimous consent. The hon. member for Northumberland—Peterborough South is rising on a point of order relating to question period.
30 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Jun/2/23 1:43:15 p.m.
  • Watch
That is not a point of order. As we have seen, sometimes it has not occurred that the two whips walk to the table. There is a point of order by the member for Northumberland—Peterborough South.
38 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border