44th Parl. 1st Sess.
June 1, 2023 10:00AM
- Jun/1/23 2:12:43 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, today, Italian Canadians are proudly part of the chamber and of the broader italo-canadese community ingrained in Canada’s social fabric.
However, the journey was not an easy one. In 1933, 90 years ago, the Christie Pits riot brought together Jews and Italians to fight against discrimination. From 1940 to 1943, nearly 31,000 Italian Canadians were considered “enemy aliens”, and almost 700 were sent to internment camps. On March 17, 1960, the Hogg’s Hollow disaster claimed the lives of five Italian Canadian construction workers who were installing a water main under the Don River in the city of Toronto. Nearly 2,000 Italian construction workers died helping to build Ontario.
During Italian Heritage Month, we celebrate the rich culture, history and traditions by sharing the stories of the brave Italian men and women who immigrated to Canada in search of opportunities but have never forgot their homeland.
La nostra storia is one of resilience.
[Member spoke in Italian]
[English]
168 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/1/23 4:12:32 p.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, it is always great to rise in this House to speak to important issues. We are speaking about climate change and how to fight it, how to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and how to strengthen our economy while improving our environment. That is a very important conversation for Canadians here in Ottawa and across this blessed country.
Before I begin my formal remarks, today the International Energy Agency released its report on the global renewable energy market. One of the comments it made was that the forecasted capacity of solar and wind is going to hit 4,500 gigawatts, which is the amount of power output today produced by China and the United States together. That is where the world is going.
Before I continue, it is my pleasure to say that I will be splitting my time with the hon. member for Milton, a wonderful riding just west of mine. He will take the floor after I am done.
This renewable energy market report by the IEA goes to show how much and how quickly the world is transitioning to renewable energy sources. We must put that in context, because what we are discussing here today is very relevant to that. We are discussing a price on an externality that we want to reduce, as we say in economics, and it is very important that we continue to put in place policies for that. This is one policy that our government has put in place among a plethora of policies, whether it is tax credits for carbon sequestration, clean fuel regulations or investing in the battery sector in the transition for the auto sector, something I am very familiar with.
There is a multitude of different pillars we have put in place that will strengthen our economy and lead to a healthier and cleaner environment. That is the future. That is where the world is going. The United States is going there. China is even going there. Europe is going there too. There will be 440 gigawatts of renewable power added in the world this coming year according to today's report.
I will now get to my formal remarks on today's opposition motion.
Madam Speaker, today I have the privilege of rising to address my colleagues in the House of Commons to discuss this motion on carbon pollution pricing.
Pricing carbon pollution is one of the most effective ways to encourage the reduction of emissions and ensure the investment needed to decarbonize the economy. It allows industry, households and companies to choose the best method of lowering their emissions rather than leaving the decision up to the government.
Pricing carbon pollution is a pillar of Canada's plan for meeting its 2030 targets and reaching net zero by 2050. Effective and comparable pan-Canadian carbon pollution pricing is vital to meeting these targets.
We must meet the objectives of 2030 and then those through to 2050.
Pausing the pan-Canadian approach to carbon pollution pricing or changing it midstream would cause significant uncertainty, particularly for the industry and for carbon credit markets. It would also curb much-needed investments in clean technologies such as carbon capture, use and sequestration.
The impact that carbon pollution pricing has on the cost of energy can be mitigated by returning revenues to households and businesses and using other types of federal funds and programs.
This is the approach our government has taken. It is returning 90% of the proceeds from the federal fuel charge to Canadians in provinces where it applies and where governments have not proposed their own plans that meet the federal model requirements.
In the Atlantic provinces, where heating oil will be subject to carbon pollution pricing for the first time next winter, most households in Newfoundland and Labrador, Nova Scotia, New Brunswick and Prince Edward Island that will pay the federal fuel charge will receive more in climate action incentive payments than they will pay for the increased costs associated with the federal fuel charge. For example, a family of four in Newfoundland and Labrador will receive a $328 rebate every four months in 2023 before they incur expenses as a result of the increased federal fuel charge.
Our government is well aware of that increase. That is why we made sure from the start that all families that have to pay the federal fuel charge will have the money to do so or to modernize their appliances that use fossil fuels. When they get their quarterly climate action incentive payments, Canadian households can use that money however they want. For example, households could use those payments to amortize the costs of carbon pollution pricing. That is one of the reasons why those payments are being sent to Canadians before they incur any expenses from the federal fuel charge. Other households may take measures to reduce their energy consumption and come out even further ahead, because they will continue to receive the same amount in climate action incentive payments while using less fossil fuels.
In addition to the climate action incentive payments, our government announced, in September 2022, half a billion dollars that will be made available to Canadian households to help them abandon costly home heating fuel, with a $250-million contribution to the low-carbon economy fund and with a $250-million investment by the oil to heat pump affordability program, a new component of the Canada greener homes initiative, overseen by my colleague the Minister of Natural Resources.
Or government is also helping small and medium-sized enterprises so that they can also modernize their equipment and their operations in order to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impact of the federal fuel charge when it applies in their province or territory. For example, $2.5 million of federal fuel charge proceeds will be returned by my department through a new program targeting small and medium-sized enterprises in trade-exposed and emissions-intensive sectors in provinces where the charge already applied before 2023, namely Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba and Ontario.
Through a jointly developed process, our government has also committed to returning 1% of fuel charge proceeds collected in Ontario, Manitoba, Saskatchewan and Alberta to indigenous recipients in those provinces under programs co-developed with indigenous organizations.
Let me be clear. Our government has demonstrated time and again that a majority of Canadians, over 80%, who pay the federal fuel charge get more money back in climate action incentive payments than they pay in charges in a year, which leaves them better off financially.
In the provinces and territories that have created their own carbon pollution pricing systems, the governments of those provinces can use the proceeds of their own carbon pollution pricing as they see fit. For example, they can use them for climate action incentive payments, similar to the federal model, or to reduce taxes for their taxpayers, if they wish.
The motion also cites carbon pollution pricing as one of the causes of inflation in Canada.
That is simply not the case. For example—
1179 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/1/23 4:23:40 p.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I want to thank my colleague for his question. It is very important.
For example, we put in place a goal to have a clean electricity system by 2035. We will need to work with those provinces that are not there yet. We will need to put in incentives to ensure they get there. We need to have a clean electrical grid, much like the province of Quebec does through hydroelectricity. Where that is not the case in other provinces, we need to create incentives and so forth for them to achieve those goals without penalizing the residents of those provinces.
104 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/1/23 4:24:55 p.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, I chat with my hon. colleague from the Prairies quite frequently and consider him a very good friend.
If we look at the numbers that have come out here in Canada in where our emissions are going and, they are going down the right trajectory. We are making those key targeted investments. The great thing is that the private sector is making those wonderful targeted investments in assets across this country in renewable power.
I believe there was an announcement today of foreign direct investment by a Greek company to build the largest solar facility in the province of Alberta, which would provide electricity for over 200,000 homes. We see the province of Alberta leading in renewable investments and in investments where it is decarbonizing its great petrochemical sector, and its great oil and gas sector, which we know supports the livelihoods of hundreds of thousands of Canadians throughout this country.
154 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- Jun/1/23 4:26:33 p.m.
- Watch
Madam Speaker, on what was in the budget, obviously pieces from the budget flow into the budget implementation act, no. 1, and then most likely in the fall.
I hope to see more investments by our government in renewable energy, much like we see on the report today from the IEA on the renewable energy marketing in the world, here in Canada. We need to continue that pace. We see it throughout the world. It has to happen in northern Canada as well because we know the cost of living in northern Canada and the use of such things as diesel needs to be replaced with clean energy sources so we can lower greenhouse gas emissions, which is a win for the environment, a win for the economy and a win for affordability for Canadians.
135 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
