SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 171

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
March 22, 2023 01:00PM
Context: House Hansard - 171 - Mar/22/23
Mr. Peter Julian
  • Mar/22/23 10:07:24 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I rise on the same point of order. If members do not have the courage to defend their speeches, they should not speak in the House, quite frankly. They have a responsibility to be accountable to members in the House. This is the third or fourth member of the Conservative Party who ran out of the House after giving their speech. Yesterday, we saw the leader of the Conservative Party not even vote on his own motion. I think this conduct is unbecoming of parliamentarians. If they are going to speak, they should have to stay and answer questions.
101 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 171 - Mar/22/23
Mr. Mike Morrice
  • Mar/22/23 10:09:59 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, on the same point of order, I think this is a question of the quality of our democracy. If, in the House of Commons, we were to switch to speeches back and forth, as opposed to debate with questions and answers, I think the level of accountability on all sides would be reduced. I ask you to rule on this very fair point of order.
67 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 171 - Mar/22/23
Mr. Daniel Blaikie
  • Mar/22/23 10:11:54 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I rise on a point of order. I think we should recall that at one time in the House of Commons there was a period without questions and comments. It was not until the McGrath committee report of the 1980s that Parliament adopted the practice of having questions and answers after comments. If we look at certain provincial legislatures, like the legislature in Manitoba, they do not have the practice of questions and comments. The McGrath committee found that parliamentary debate would be far better if members were asked questions after their speeches. It was due to a very deliberate attempt to improve the quality of debate, by the McGrath committee in 1989, that we have questions and comments. Unless we are going to study the issue and change our Standing Orders, I do not think members should go back on an important reflection of members at that time. It has been the tradition, up until now, to have meaningful debate in the chamber by having questions and comments, and that is what members are doing. Whether they are leaving the chamber or whether they are just stupefied, which I can believe with some members on the Conservative bench, and they choose to stay in their place—
210 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border