SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 139

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 1, 2022 10:00AM
  • Dec/1/22 11:16:27 a.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-26 
Mr. Speaker, I want to thank my colleague for Kildonan—St. Paul for taking part in the Manitoba debate that is going on here. The member commented on SMEs, noting that half of them had no defence and were the most vulnerable. As with the bill I was able to get through last year on SMEs and small businesses, it is very important they have the abilities and rights to protect themselves on this as well. In response to the last question, the member also talked about transparency, which is so important. Could the member expand on those two areas?
101 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/1/22 12:32:24 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-26 
Madam Speaker, I think our Minister of Public Safety was very clear this morning. Without question, every time the government takes additional, decisive action and puts additional measures in place, there has to be corresponding transparency and accountability. We absolutely need to make sure there is enough of that in Bill C-26 so we have the confidence not only of the House but of Canadians with regard to having the proper accountability and transparency in place.
77 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/1/22 1:19:16 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-26 
Madam Speaker, this morning my colleague from Kildonan—St. Paul made an excellent presentation on this bill. She talked about the transparency that may be lacking in certain areas and the effects on small businesses and how they may not be able to afford the cost like a larger company. I wonder if my colleague could expand on that.
60 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/1/22 1:19:25 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-26 
Madam Speaker, that is an excellent point. I did not have a chance in my remarks to talk specifically about the transparency issues. Again, we need to support this bill through the second reading stage out of agreement with the general principle that we need to do more on cybersecurity, recognizing how far behind the government has been. However, there are significant issues with respect to ensuring transparency. There are significant issues on whether the bill is clear and specific enough about the steps that are required, instead of just leaving it, as we see often with the government and legislation, and giving an open-ended blank cheque to the government. There are definitely issues. This requires a detailed committee study. I hope Conservative proposals will be adopted and we will be able to strengthen the bill as a result.
140 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/1/22 2:51:13 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, CSIS advised the Prime Minister in its top secret briefing note that the way to combat foreign interference was through “a policy that is grounded in transparency and sunlight in order to highlight the point that [foreign interference] should be exposed to the public”. Why are the Prime Minister and the government not heeding this advice? Why are they not going public and telling Canadians exactly which candidates and which riding associations were involved in Beijing's foreign interference?
83 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/1/22 2:52:16 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, intelligence experts here and in the Five Eyes are saying that the best way to combat foreign interference is transparency and sunshine, to go public with information. That is why last summer the U.K. government and MI5 went public about a Beijing agent in the U.K. Parliament, Christine Lee. She was publicly named and so were the MPs who were the target of her donations. Those MPs took action to protect the integrity of the U.K. Parliament. Why will the government not do the same thing in this country?
94 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/1/22 2:55:58 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, on this side of the House, we have put in place a number of measures to increase transparency about threats of foreign interference. For example, we have the National Security and Intelligence Committee of Parliamentarians and the National Security and Intelligence Review Agency, independent bodies that have issued two reports confirming that the 2019 and 2021 elections were free and fair. We will improve transparency because it is a value that protects our democratic institutions.
77 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Dec/1/22 3:44:26 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-26 
Madam Speaker, that was a very interesting intervention. I am not a specialist in cybersecurity, so I am finding this debate very informative. I guess one of the questions I have is about how we balance the need for cybersecurity with the need for transparency. That is really what the big question is for this. How do we make it effective but also adhere to the Canadian values of transparency, human rights and whatnot? I wonder if the member has anything to say about the fact—
87 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border