SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 136

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
November 28, 2022 11:00AM
  • Nov/28/22 3:10:19 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, on Wednesday, child care workers and advocates are holding a day of action. Their message is that child care staff are worth more than they are being paid. As a former childhood educator, I know first-hand how inadequate pay and benefits make recruiting and retaining staff more difficult and the biggest barriers to expanding licensed child care and improving access is the shortage of child care staff. Will the Liberals ensure that federal child care funding is used for livable wages and good benefits for child care workers?
91 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 5:20:00 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Madam Speaker, Bill C-27 does not explicitly apply to political parties, and in the past we have seen the possibility of privacy breaches and misuse in the political arena. Should the bill be amended to specifically include political parties?
40 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 5:37:37 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Mr. Speaker, my hon. colleague spoke about rights, and I agree with her that privacy rights are an important part of the digital age. Like other rights, we must be clear where we stand on them. I am wondering if the member agrees with me in questioning whether making it easier for the Facebooks and the Googles of the world to use Canadians' personal information in ways that have nothing to do with their services in the guise of helping small business is the right place to stand. That is certainly one of concerns I have.
96 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 5:49:48 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Mr. Speaker, would the member agree that the creation of two new categories of data exempt from privacy measures is a worrisome gesture by the Liberals and could be a gift to the very technology giants to which they have such close ties?
43 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Nov/28/22 6:27:16 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-27 
Mr. Speaker, the private right of action would allow individuals and groups of consumers to seek compensation in court. This has been used effectively in the United States to remedy violations, but it is very burdensome in Bill C-27 to make it even usable. For example, if the Privacy Commissioner does not investigate or rule on a complaint, an individual has no right of action. If the Privacy Commissioner does investigate and rule on a complaint but the tribunal does not uphold it, the individual has no right of action. These are a couple of examples. Does my hon. colleague feel that this bill should be amended to fix this?
111 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border