SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Hansard - 67

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 9, 2022 11:00AM
  • May/9/22 2:35:55 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the hon. member talks about housing supply, yet that party, including him, voted against the first stage of investments in the housing accelerator fund, a program that single-handedly will deliver 100,000 units in new housing supply across the country. They vote against investments in co-ops, in the rapid housing initiative and to make sure that we reinvest more money in the Canada housing benefit. We are bringing forward money for the national housing co-investment fund to build 22,000 permanent affordable homes, for the housing accelerator fund and for the innovation fund.
98 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:36:37 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, despite all of the government's rhetoric, the reality is that the price of a home continues to be unattainable for many young families. You just have to admit you failed. Now the Liberals say they are going to address housing supply, yet they excluded any measure in the budget implementation act to address housing supply. When will the government realize that promises and empty rhetoric do not build houses?
72 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:37:02 p.m.
  • Watch
I remind members to address the Chair and not members directly. The hon. Minister of Housing.
16 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:37:12 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the hon. member for Mission—Matsqui—Fraser Canyon is on record as saying that we should walk away from our leadership role and investments in affordable housing and just leave it to the provinces. That is the leadership he is suggesting. He talks about housing supply. We are dedicated to housing supply through the housing accelerator fund for 100,000 new homes and making permanent, sustainable changes in permitting, zoning, intensification and infrastructure to make sure we build more housing for the future.
87 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:37:49 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, this government seems to think that everything is going well. Inflation has not been this high in 30 years, the deficit is huge, immigration is in a terrible state and every young Canadian's dream of owning property is shattered. What is this government going to do so that our young people can believe in the future and own property? What is it going to do now, not in 10 years or five years?
76 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:38:25 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Conservatives continue to talk down the Canadian economy with their false economic rhetoric. However, the latest data from Statistics Canada shows that our GDP grew by 5.6% in the first quarter, exceeding market expectations, and the International Monetary Fund recently forecast that Canada will have the highest growth rate in the G7. We are here to make life more affordable for Canadians. The economy is growing. Canadians should be proud.
74 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:38:56 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-13 
Mr. Speaker, Camille Laurin, father of the Charter of the French Language, would have turned 100 last Friday. To mark the occasion, every minister responsible for the French language over the past 30 years, across party lines, indicated how important it is to be constantly taking action to promote French. That proves that French is in danger. Bill C-13 will reinforce institutional bilingualism and enable federally regulated businesses to use English instead of French. That is not what Quebeckers want. Why is Ottawa continuing to undermine Quebec and the protection of French?
95 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:39:38 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-13 
Mr. Speaker, I thank my colleague for her question. As a woman from New Brunswick who lives in an official language minority community, I know how important it is to protect and promote French across the country, including in Quebec, because French is in decline. That is why we are moving forward with a new version of Bill C-13. This will ensure that we can do more to protect and strengthen our rights as francophones across Canada.
79 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:40:07 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-13 
Mr. Speaker, it is French that is in decline in Quebec, not English. It is French that must be protected, not bilingualism. Bill C-13 prevents Quebec from imposing the Charter of the French Language and instead lets federally regulated businesses choose between French and the Canada-wide bilingual model. That is the very model followed by Air Canada and CN, two federal businesses located in Quebec that are required to provide services in French, but that, despite everything, could not care less about francophones. Is this really the model that must apply throughout Quebec? If it is, that is unacceptable.
101 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:40:50 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-13 
Mr. Speaker, first, I am not here to play politics. I am here to protect and promote French across the country, including in Quebec. We have been very clear: French is declining in Canada, including Quebec. That is why we are moving forward with a new version of Bill C‑13, which seeks to protect and promote the rights of francophones across the country. I hope that the Bloc Québécois will work with us to ensure that this bill is passed as quickly as possible, because it will make a real difference in the lives of all Canadians.
103 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:41:26 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-13 
Mr. Speaker, if they want to work with us, then they need to listen to us a little. With their new Bill C-13, the Liberals are denying French's uniqueness in a sea of hundreds of millions of anglophones. They are preventing Quebec from applying the Charter of the French Language to all federally regulated businesses. They are not protecting French. They are protecting bilingualism, which is not at all at risk in Quebec, any more than English is. Bilingualism is doing so well that it is undermining French as the common language. Does the minister realize that her bill does not protect French but instead encourages anglicization?
110 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:42:06 p.m.
  • Watch
  • Re: Bill C-13 
Mr. Speaker, what I see is that the opposition member did not read Bill C-13 in its entirety. The exact opposite is true. We are moving forward to ensure that we do everything we can to protect and promote French across Canada, including in Quebec. As a francophone who lives in an official language minority community in New Brunswick, I object to the question the member opposite asked because I protect and promote French every day.
78 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:42:42 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we know that our special forces King Air intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance platform was monitoring the truckers convoy protest on Parliament Hill. The Prime Minister has called it a “training flight”. If the government was prepared to send up ISR aircraft over the protest, what was it doing to gather intelligence on the ground? One does not engage one without the other. My question is this. What was the coordination between Public Safety, National Defence, the Canadian Forces, the Privy Council and the Prime Minister's Office during the protest?
94 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:43:20 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to reiterate what the Prime Minister said last week a number of times, for the benefit of my hon. colleague. He stated: The flight in question was part of a Canadian Armed Forces training exercise that was planned prior to and was unrelated to the convoy protest. The training had nothing to do with the convoy blockade, and we will continue to reiterate that fact.
70 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:44:02 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, we know a special forces surveillance flight took place. We know the government even let the health agency spy on Canadians' liquor habits during COVID. The Prime Minister has called it a “training exercise”. What does the government think an ISR does for training, just fly around in circles? It gathers intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance over a target, and that target clearly was the protest. I have two questions: Who was that reconnaissance platform reporting to when it was gathering intelligence on Canadians, and what special policing authorities were granted to the Canadian Armed Forces at that time?
102 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:44:45 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would like to reiterate that the assumptions underlying that question are misguided. Again, the Canadian Armed Forces flight was part of a training exercise. The exercise was planned prior to and was unrelated to the presence of the protesters and the convoy. The opposition does not seem to appreciate or like this point, but it is the truth.
61 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:45:22 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Minister of National Defence told my colleague that the special forces had planned the King Air flight over Ottawa long before the convoy. However, the operations, which lasted four days, were conducted while people were using cellular communications and moving around. My question is simple. Was the intelligence gathered by the King Air during training used by the government, or was it destroyed?
66 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:45:51 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, as I said in English, the flight in question was part of a training exercise. The Canadian Armed Forces also conducted this exercise. The training had nothing to do with the convoy. Those are the facts.
38 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:46:15 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, abortion and reproductive health services are not accessible across the country. Women, particularly in northern and rural communities, are forced to drive for hours to access essential health care services. Last year, the government promised $45 million for a sexual and reproductive health fund, but providers have not seen a single dollar for these essential services. It is not good enough for the government to say the right things; it must increase accessibility now. When will it actually deliver the promised funding for abortion and health services in Canada?
91 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • May/9/22 2:46:54 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I am very glad to hear this question, because defending the rights of women here and across Canada is absolutely essential. We will be there every step of the way to do that. I look forward to making further announcements. I ask my colleague to be watching closely for what is soon to be news on that particular front.
61 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border