44th Parl. 1st Sess.
May 3, 2022 10:00AM
- May/3/22 2:21:15 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, for days during the illegal protest on Wellington Street, the Prime Minister stayed in hiding, refusing to intervene and deliberately sowing discord and division by condemning Canadians who did not think like him.
Then on February 14, realizing that his inaction might backfire, he brought out the big guns, the Emergencies Act, claiming that the police needed it to deal with the protests.
Protesters returned on the weekend. They left, without the Emergencies Act.
Can the Prime Minister tell us why?
85 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:21:18 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would first like to thank all the police forces and the RCMP for their good work. Last week, they carefully prepared a plan for the protest.
This protest played out very differently from the events in January and February, when we invoked the Emergencies Act on advice from the police. It was a necessary and responsible decision, and we are going to work with the commissioner and parliamentarians in the interest of transparency.
77 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:21:53 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, to justify invoking the Emergencies Act, the Liberal government cited security threats. It stated, “the threats of violence and presence of firearms at protests...constitute a public order emergency”.
These are serious allegations that created a lot of public concern.
Knowing that, why did the Prime Minister allow members, senators and House of Commons staff to continue to circulate among the protesters at the protest in January and February?
73 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:22:30 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, from the beginning of the illegal blockade last winter, we offered a great deal of support to all parliamentarians working on the Hill. However, what some parliamentarians experienced here was very different from what the residents of Ottawa experienced, which included many disruptions and violence in the community. This was proven by all the arrests made by the police.
The Emergencies Act needed to be invoked. We will now co-operate with all transparency processes.
77 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:23:45 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there was a plenty of evidence of disruptions at the border, in our communities and to our economy. Many Canadians lost their jobs temporarily. That is one reason why the Emergencies Act needed to be invoked.
Now we must participate in a transparency process, and the government will co-operate with the commissioner, Justice Rouleau.
57 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:32:50 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I will ask the Minister of Public Safety the same question I asked yesterday, a question that he suspiciously avoided answering.
Did any minister or members of their political staff speak with Justice Rouleau before his appointment as commissioner on the inquiry into the Emergencies Act?
Did they discuss what kind of evidence the inquiry would or would not seek, including documents covered under cabinet confidence or solicitor-client privilege?
72 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:33:18 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I can assure my hon. colleague that the government is fully committed to being transparent around the events and circumstances that led to the invocation of the Emergencies Act.
Last week, we launched the public inquiry, affording Justice Rouleau broad powers to compel witnesses, documents and information, including some classified information, should he choose to ask for it.
Our intention is to shine a light on those events and it would be, I think, a point of departure to hear the Conservatives recognize that there was an emergency. We fulfilled our responsibility to protect Canadians.
97 words
All Topics
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:33:56 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, he is avoiding the question again, but I will move on.
This past weekend, Ottawa saw the so-called “Rolling Thunder” protest come and go without major incident. During the "freedom convoy” protest, the government claimed that it needed the Emergencies Act because it needed to compel tow truck drivers to remove the protesters.
Over this last weekend, we saw many vehicles towed without needing the Emergencies Act, yet another blow to this government's fabricated claims.
If the government did not need extraordinary powers to get the tow trucks, what did it need them for?
101 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:34:31 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, first and foremost, I would like to begin by expressing my gratitude to all frontline police officers, including members of the RCMP, who ensured that we were able to maintain public safety over the course of the past weekend.
Of course, there are big distinctions between what occurred last weekend and what occurred last winter, which was a national emergency.
We invoked the Emergencies Act after we received advice from law enforcement. Once it was invoked, we were able to restore public safety, and now we will ensure that there is transparency in the accountability of that decision.
100 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:35:08 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, yesterday, the minister claimed that Liberals invoked the Emergencies Act because they needed it, yet there was a large protest, related to the winter one that he just referred to, this past weekend, and as far as I am aware, no one remains camped out on the roadways around Parliament. This is in direct contradiction to what the minister is claiming. As this weekend showed, with leadership and coordination between government and police, peace and order can be maintained.
There was clearly a failure by the Liberals to show leadership during the winter protest, as the minister refers to it, and they used the Emergencies Act to bail themselves out.
Is that not right?
116 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:35:49 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, I would point out that, notwithstanding the fact that public safety was maintained, there were enforcement actions taken last week as a result of some individuals who, again, crossed the line and broke the law.
It would be, again, an opportunity for the Conservatives to recognize, finally, after months of denying it, that there was an emergency. Collectively, we have a responsibility and a burden as parliamentarians to uphold the law. That is exactly what we did when we invoked the Emergencies Act, and now we will ensure that there is transparency, so that all Canadians can be reaffirmed in that decision.
104 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:37:08 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, first and foremost, I am very relieved that my colleague was able to access the Hill with the additional protection and safety that was offered by the RCMP, by the Parliamentary Protection Service and by the Sergeant-at-Arms, but there is a big difference between what some of us were able to experience on the Hill and what was going on off the Hill.
There can be no doubt that people who live in Ottawa had their lives completely upended by the illegal occupation here, and that people who lived in border communities had their lives upended. That was because individuals broke the law to a point of a national emergency. That is why we invoked the Emergencies Act. We did it to protect Canadians.
128 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:37:53 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, this past weekend, there were protests in downtown Ottawa. The police, the City and the various stakeholders managed the situation effectively and quickly. It was simply a matter of leadership.
However, last January, the government was completely overwhelmed by the events on Parliament Hill and hid behind the Emergencies Act.
Will the Prime Minister finally admit that he failed to show leadership?
64 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:38:28 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, there are many differences between last winter's protest and last weekend's, which was much smaller.
Last winter's blockade and occupation were illegal. We listened very respectfully to what the police forces told us. Then we very carefully made the decision to invoke the Emergencies Act. That decision was necessary. Now we will collaborate with all transparency efforts.
62 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:39:06 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, that is not an answer.
Again, the protest this past weekend was orderly. It was simply a matter of leadership. The Minister of Public Safety said, “first of all, we are relieved because of the good work of the police forces on the ground, including the RCMP, which added resources to assure everyone that public safety would be maintained.” That is what he is repeating today.
How can he still claim today that it was really necessary to invoke the Emergencies Act for the January events?
90 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- May/3/22 2:39:43 p.m.
- Watch
Mr. Speaker, the short answer is that it was necessary.
There was a lot of disruption at the border. There was a lot of disruption to the economy. There was a lot of disruption to public safety for many Canadians. Those are the reasons why we invoked the Emergencies Act. It was not an easy decision to make. It was a tough, but necessary decision.
Now, we on this side of the House will be transparent during the inquiry into this process.
82 words
- Hear!
- Rabble!
- add
- star_border
- share
- menumenu
- notificationsnotifications
- home
- mailmail
- searchsearch
