SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of Parliament

Kyle Seeback

  • Member of Parliament
  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Dufferin—Caledon
  • Ontario
  • Voting Attendance: 64%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $136,309.03

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 280 - Feb/12/24
Mr. Kyle Seeback (Dufferin—Caledon, CPC)
  • Feb/12/24 2:08:59 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, the Prime Minister's arrive scam app is not worth the cost and is absolutely not worth the corruption. The arrive scam app was supposed to cost $80,000, but it ended up costing at least $60 million. We say “at least” as no one knows for sure because of the complex web of corruption that was engaged in. Wait, it gets worse. There was $12 million that went to well-connected Liberal insiders who did no work. Speaking of no work, it actually did not work. In one month alone, 10,000 people were sent to quarantine who did not have to be quarantined. Today, the Parliamentary Budget Officer said that there was a glaring disregard of basic management. The Liberals cannot even manage their corruption properly. What we know for sure is this. The arrive scam app is not worth the cost and not worth the Prime Minister's corruption.
156 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 234 - Oct/18/23
Mr. Kyle Seeback
  • Oct/18/23 5:41:41 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, only a Liberal government could design an app for $54 million that some people could design in their homes on a weekend, because the Liberals are so incompetent. What makes it worse is that their incompetence also comes with an incredible amount of corruption. A common-sense Conservative government working for the people would never let that happen.
60 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 98 - Sep/20/22
Mr. Kyle Seeback
Madam Speaker, I know the member is very passionate about this and spoke very eloquently at committee about it. Someone in her riding had gone on maternity leave and, because of the three-year requirement for the income, missed the income requirement for the low-income cut-off. An appeal process would have been great for the bill. I know the member tried to have that added to the bill. It is something that I wanted, but unfortunately it did not make it through committee. I think we can address that in another way, which is by moving forward with this bill to get that low-income cut-off lowered substantially, because that would address most of the concerns. Maybe the appeal process is something we can look at down the road.
132 words
All Topics
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border