SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Member of Parliament

Hon. Mike Lake

  • Member of Parliament
  • Conservative
  • Edmonton—Wetaskiwin
  • Alberta
  • Voting Attendance: 65%
  • Expenses Last Quarter: $178,671.82

  • Government Page
Context: House Hansard - 192 - May/8/23
Hon. Mike Lake
  • May/8/23 11:12:44 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, multiple times, probably a dozen times now, Speakers have ruled that the member's point is not a point of order. I have the two words he did say and withdrew. I have them. I was not referring to those, the ones he apologized for. I think he apologized twice on the day, but— Mr. Mark Gerretsen: What two words? Hon. Mike Lake: Mr. Speaker, he is asking me to say the two words. The words he apologized for saying were said when he referred to the member for Wellington—Halton Hills as being “supposedly affected”. He apologized for those words. I was not going to read those words, but he is heckling me, asking me to read them. Mr. Mark Gerretsen: That is not true. I apologized for—
136 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 192 - May/8/23
Hon. Mike Lake
  • May/8/23 6:11:52 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, does the member believe the hon. member for Winnipeg North should stand right now and apologize for saying that the member for Wellington—Halton Hills was not credible?
31 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 192 - May/8/23
Hon. Mike Lake
  • May/8/23 6:11:29 p.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, the hon. member is correct. I did walk across and said that if he did not apologize, I am going to keep asking the question, and I will keep asking the question—
35 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 192 - May/8/23
Hon. Mike Lake
  • May/8/23 4:24:59 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, I will point out that the other parliamentary secretary to the government House leader, the member for Kingston and the Islands, at the time, said the member for Wellington—Halton Hills was “supposedly affected”. He used those words. That member of Parliament did uncategorically apologize for his comments, but I want to ask the member from the Bloc this: To what extent does a combative, bullying approach from the government on an issue as important as this one impact our ability to have real democratic conversations in the House?
94 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 191 - May/4/23
Hon. Mike Lake
  • May/4/23 1:47:50 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, he is referencing the point of order. The fact of the matter is that if we are looking at that particular point, and there is something else that you should apologize for but, on a technicality, said it was not on the record, on that particular point, you said the Prime Minister had a briefing on Monday and then you said that the member got the same briefing two years ago. The member did not get the same briefing that the Prime Minister got, and then you put it on the member and asked—
97 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 191 - May/4/23
Hon. Mike Lake
  • May/4/23 12:20:22 p.m.
  • Watch
Mr. Speaker, because the hon. member used the phrase “to correct the record”, to correct the record myself, the hon. member used the phrase “supposedly affected” in regard to the member for Wellington—Halton Hills today. He now has a chance to stand up and apologize.
51 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
Context: House Hansard - 191 - May/4/23
Hon. Mike Lake
  • May/4/23 11:04:14 a.m.
  • Watch
Madam Speaker, it will not take me 20 seconds. My question, given the gravity of the situation, is very straightforward: Will the hon. member who just spoke turn around and ask his two colleagues, who hold leadership positions in his party, to unreservedly apologize to the member for Wellington—Halton Hills?
52 words
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border