SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Senate Bill

Bill S-4

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 13, 2022
An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Identification of Criminals Act and to make related amendments to other Acts (COVID-19 response and other measures)
  • This bill amends the Criminal Code to make changes related to jury selection, remote appearances for accused individuals, remote participation in jury selection, administrative matters for unrepresented accused, fingerprinting, and search warrants. It also corrects technical errors and includes transitional provisions. The bill provides for independent reviews and a parliamentary review of remote proceedings in criminal justice matters. It was assented to on December 15, 2022.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea (27)
  • Nay (43)
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • A steelman argument in favor of the mentioned Act is that it provides necessary updates and amendments to the Criminal Code and the Identification of Criminals Act in order to adapt to the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic. The Act allows for the use of electronic or other automated means for jury selection, which can streamline and expedite the process. It also expands the availability of remote appearances by audioconference and videoconference for the accused and offenders, providing more flexibility and reducing the need for in-person appearances, which can help mitigate the spread of COVID-19. Additionally, the Act allows for the participation of prospective jurors in the jury selection process by videoconference in certain circumstances, ensuring that the justice system can continue to function while prioritizing public health and safety. The Act also grants courts expanded powers to make case management rules, allowing co

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument: This Act, despite its intention to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic and modernize the criminal justice system, raises concerns about the erosion of constitutional rights and the potential for abuse of power. Firstly, the use of electronic or automated means for jury selection may lead to a less representative jury, as certain groups may be less likely to have access to or be proficient in using these technologies. This could undermine the principle of a fair trial and equality before the law. Secondly, the increased use of remote appearances by audio and videoconference for the accused and offenders may limit their ability to effectively communicate with their legal counsel and contribute to a fair defense. The lack of in-person interaction could affect the quality and nuances of legal arguments and lead to potential misunderstandings or misinterpretations. Thirdly, the participation of prospective jurors in the j
Senate Third Reading
  • Dec. 15, 2022, 10 a.m.
  • Passed
Royal Assent
  • Dec. 15, 2022, 10 a.m.
  • Read
House Third Reading
  • Dec. 13, 2022, 6:01 p.m.
  • Passed

House Committee

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 13, 2022
Standing Committee on Justice and Human Rights (JUST)
Re. Bill S-4, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Identification of Criminals Act and to make related amendments …
  • Report 9 presented to the House
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
  • Hear!
  • Rabble!
  • star_border
House Second Reading
  • Nov. 24, 2022, 4:53 p.m.
  • Passed
House First Reading
  • Sept. 23, 2022, 12:24 p.m.
  • Passed