SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Senate Bill

Bill S-282

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
April 11, 2024
National Strategy for Children and Youth Act
  • This is a bill called the National Strategy for Children and Youth Act. It aims to create a national strategy to support children and youth in Canada. The strategy will have objectives such as eliminating child poverty, ensuring a high standard of living for children and youth, and complying with international conventions and declarations related to children's rights. The Minister responsible will consult with various stakeholders, including children and youth, to develop the strategy. Progress reports will be provided to Parliament, and a review will be conducted every five years to assess the implementation of the strategy.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • Steelman Argument: The National Strategy for Children and Youth Act (Bill S-282) is a crucial step towards ensuring the well-being and development of children and youth in Canada. By developing a national strategy, the government can establish clear objectives and standards for the support and protection of children and youth, aligning with international standards and human rights obligations. One of the key objectives of the strategy is the complete elimination of child poverty. This is a pressing issue that affects the physical, mental, and social development of children and youth. By setting this objective, the government acknowledges the importance of addressing poverty as a fundamental barrier to the well-being of children and youth. The strategy also aims to ensure a high and consistent standard of living for children and youth across Canada. By identifying quantifiable indicators and outcomes, the government can measure progress and hold itself accountable for achieving these standards. This will help in identifying gaps and areas that require immediate attention and preventive measures. Furthermore, the strategy emphasizes the importance of complying with international conventions and declarations, such as the Convention on the Rights of the Child and the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples. By incorporating these obligations into the strategy, the government demonstrates its commitment to protecting the rights of children and youth, including those from Indigenous communities. Consultations with various stakeholders, including children and youth themselves, Indigenous governing bodies, and relevant government ministers, ensure that the strategy reflects the diverse needs and experiences of children and youth in Canada. This inclusive approach allows for a comprehensive understanding of the challenges faced by different groups and enables the development of targeted solutions. The strategy also includes mechanisms for public monitoring, continued consultation, and parliamentary oversight, ensuring transparency and accountability in its implementation. This allows for ongoing evaluation and adaptation of the strategy to address emerging needs and changing circumstances. Investing in the well-being and growth of children and youth is not only a moral imperative but also crucial for building an equitable and prosperous Canada. By prioritizing the development of a national strategy, the government demonstrates its commitment to the future of the country and the well-being of its youngest citizens.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument Opposing Bill S-282: An Act respecting a national strategy for children and youth in Canada Introduction: While the intention behind Bill S-282, to develop a national strategy to support children and youth in Canada, may seem noble, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences and the role of the government in such matters. This steelman argument will present right-wing anti-government talking points to oppose the bill. 1. Limited Government Intervention: Right-wing ideology emphasizes limited government intervention in the economy and society. The development of a national strategy for children and youth implies an expanded role for the government in the lives of individuals and families. This can lead to increased bureaucracy, inefficiency, and a reduction in personal freedom. 2. Individual Responsibility: Right-wing ideology emphasizes individual responsibility and self-reliance. By implementing a national strategy, the government may inadvertently discourage individuals and families from taking responsibility for their own well-being and relying on government support instead. This can create a culture of dependency and hinder personal growth and resilience. 3. Subsidiarity: Right-wing ideology supports the principle of subsidiarity, which advocates for decision-making to be made at the lowest possible level of authority. A national strategy for children and youth may undermine the autonomy of local communities, provinces, and families to address the specific needs and challenges they face. Local solutions are often more effective and tailored to the unique circumstances of different regions. 4. Economic Impact: Implementing a national strategy for children and youth would require significant financial resources. This could lead to increased government spending, higher taxes, or increased public debt, which can have negative consequences for economic growth and individual prosperity. It is important to prioritize fiscal responsibility and consider the long-term economic implications of such initiatives. 5. Parental Rights and Choices: Right-wing ideology emphasizes the importance of parental rights and choices in raising children. A national strategy may infringe upon the rights of parents to make decisions regarding the upbringing, education, and healthcare of their children. It is crucial to respect the diversity of parenting styles and values within society and avoid a one-size-fits-all approach imposed by the government. Conclusion: While the intention behind Bill S-282 is to support children and youth in Canada, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences and the role of the government in such matters. Right-wing ideology emphasizes limited government intervention, individual responsibility, subsidiarity, economic impact, and parental rights and choices. These principles should be taken into account when evaluating the
Senate Second Reading
  • Nov. 21, 2023, 2 p.m.
  • In Progress
  • Read
Senate First Reading
  • Nov. 21, 2023, 2 p.m.
  • Passed