SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Bill S-15

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
March 19, 2024
  • This bill, called Bill S-15, is an amendment to the Criminal Code and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act. It aims to create new laws related to keeping elephants and great apes in captivity, with some exceptions. The bill specifies the circumstances in which the importation or exportation of these animals may be permitted, as well as the circumstances in which keeping them in captivity may be authorized. The bill was introduced in the Senate of Canada on November 21, 2023.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • A steelman argument in favor of Bill S-15, An Act to amend the Criminal Code and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act, could be as follows: The amendment to the Criminal Code and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act is necessary to address the evolving public opinion on the captivity of certain animal species that are not domesticated. The amendment specifically focuses on elephants and great apes, recognizing that scientific evidence supports the view that these animals should not be kept in captivity due to the cruelty it represents. By creating offences related to keeping elephants and great apes in captivity, the amendment sends a strong message that the mistreatment of these animals will not be tolerated. It establishes legal duties for individuals who possess these animals, including the duty to prevent natural breeding, which is crucial for preventing the proliferation of captive populations. The amendment also provides exceptions for certain circumstances where keeping elephants and great apes in captivity may be justified. This includes situations where it is in the best interests of the animal's welfare, for scientific research programs, or for conservation programs. These exceptions ensure that the amendment does not unduly restrict legitimate activities that contribute to the well-being and conservation of these species. Furthermore, the amendment regulates the importation, exportation, and interprovincial transportation of living elephants and great apes. This helps prevent the illegal trade of these animals, which can contribute to their exploitation and endangerment in the wild. Overall, the amendment to the Criminal Code and the Wild Animal and Plant Protection and Regulation of International and Interprovincial Trade Act is a necessary step towards protecting the welfare of elephants and great apes, while also allowing for certain exceptions that serve important scientific and conservation purposes. It reflects the evolving understanding and concern for the well-being of non-domesticated animals in captivity.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument Opposing Bill S-15: While the intention behind Bill S-15 may be to protect certain animal species, particularly elephants and great apes, from cruelty, there are several concerns with this proposed legislation. This argument opposes the bill from a right-wing anti-government perspective. 1. Government Overreach: This bill represents yet another example of government overreach into the private lives and property rights of individuals. It is not the role of the government to dictate how individuals choose to keep and care for animals on their own property. This legislation infringes on personal freedoms and undermines individual autonomy. 2. Economic Impact: Banning the keeping of elephants and great apes in captivity will have negative economic consequences. Many zoos and wildlife parks rely on these animals to attract visitors and generate revenue. By prohibiting their captivity, this bill threatens the livelihoods of those working in the tourism and entertainment industries, leading to job losses and economic decline. 3. Scientific Research and Conservation: The bill's exceptions for scientific research and conservation programs are insufficient. By limiting the ability to breed, impregnate, or permit natural breeding of these animals, the bill hampers important research and conservation efforts. These programs play a crucial role in understanding and protecting these species, and restricting them will hinder progress in these fields. 4. Animal Welfare: Contrary to the bill's stated purpose of protecting animal welfare, banning the captivity of elephants and great apes may actually have negative consequences for their well-being. In captivity, these animals receive regular veterinary care, proper nutrition, and protection from predators. By forcing them into the wild, they may be exposed to disease, starvation, and other dangers. It is important to consider the potential negative impact on the animals themselves before implementing such a ban. 5. Cultural and Educational Value: Zoos and wildlife parks provide educational opportunities for the public to learn about and appreciate these magnificent animals. By banning their captivity, we deny future generations the chance to develop a connection with these species and understand the importance of conservation efforts. This legislation undermines the cultural and educational value that these animals bring to society. In conclusion, while the intention of Bill S-15 may be to protect certain animal species, it represents government overreach, threatens economic livelihoods, hampers scientific research and conservation efforts, may have negative consequences for animal welfare, and undermines cultural and educational value. It is important to consider these concerns and explore alternative approaches that balance animal welfare with individual freedoms and economic considerations.
  • March 19, 2024, 2 p.m.
  • In Progress
  • Read
  • Nov. 21, 2023, 2 p.m.
  • Passed
  • Nov. 21, 2023, 2 p.m.
  • Passed