SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Ontario Assembly Bill

Ontario Bill 127

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
June 07, 2023
Captain Craig Bowman Act, 2023
  • This is a law called Bill 127 that was passed in 2023 in Ontario, Canada. It amends the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997 to include provisions for firefighters and fire investigators who develop primary-site esophageal cancer. The law establishes a presumption that the cancer is work-related for these workers if they have at least 20 years of employment or service before being diagnosed. The law also includes provisions for claims based on these presumptions. The law is named the Captain Craig Bowman Act, 2023.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • One steelman argument in favor of Bill 127 2023, also known as the Captain Craig Bowman Act, is that it recognizes and addresses the unique health risks faced by firefighters and fire investigators. By amending the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, the Act establishes a presumption in favor of primary-site esophageal cancer for eligible workers in the firefighting profession. The argument acknowledges that firefighters and fire investigators are exposed to numerous hazardous substances and carcinogens during the course of their duties. These substances can include toxic chemicals, smoke, and other harmful materials that can lead to serious health conditions, including cancer. The Act recognizes the potential link between firefighting and primary-site esophageal cancer, and seeks to provide support and compensation to those affected. The Act sets specific criteria for eligibility, requiring a minimum of 20 years of employment or service as a firefighter or fire investigator before being diagnosed with primary-site esophageal cancer. This criterion ensures that the presumption is applied to those who have dedicated a significant portion of their lives to the profession and have a higher likelihood of being affected by the disease due to their prolonged exposure to occupational hazards. By establishing a presumption, the Act simplifies the process for affected workers to access compensation and support. It removes the burden of proof from the workers, who would otherwise have to demonstrate a direct causal link between their occupation and the development of primary-site esophageal cancer. This can be a challenging task, given the complexity of cancer causation and the difficulty in establishing a clear cause-effect relationship. Furthermore, the Act demonstrates a commitment to the well-being and safety of firefighters and fire investigators. It recognizes the sacrifices made by these individuals in protecting the community and acknowledges the potential long-term health consequences they may face as a result of their service. By providing support and compensation, the Act aims to alleviate the financial and emotional burdens faced by affected workers and their families. In summary, the steelman argument in favor of Bill 127 2023 is that it addresses the unique health risks faced by firefighters and fire investigators by establishing a presumption in favor of primary-site esophageal cancer. It simplifies the process for affected workers to access compensation and support, recognizes their dedication to the profession, and demonstrates a commitment to their well-being and safety.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument Opposing Bill 127 2023: While the intention behind Bill 127 2023, also known as the Captain Craig Bowman Act, may be to provide support for firefighters and fire investigators diagnosed with primary-site esophageal cancer, there are several concerns from a right-wing anti-government perspective. Firstly, this bill introduces a presumption that primary-site esophageal cancer is work-related for firefighters and fire investigators who have served for at least 20 years. This presumption undermines the principle of individual responsibility and accountability. It assumes that all cases of primary-site esophageal cancer in these professions are caused by their work, without considering other potential factors such as lifestyle choices or genetic predispositions. Secondly, this bill expands the scope of the Workplace Safety and Insurance Act, 1997, which could lead to increased costs for employers and taxpayers. By creating a presumption of work-relatedness, the burden of proof is shifted onto employers to demonstrate that the cancer was not caused by work-related factors. This could result in higher insurance premiums for employers, ultimately leading to reduced job opportunities and economic growth. Furthermore, this bill sets a dangerous precedent by allowing the government to intervene in the insurance industry and dictate coverage requirements. It undermines the principles of free-market competition and individual choice. Instead of allowing insurance companies to assess risks and determine coverage based on actuarial data, this bill imposes a one-size-fits-all approach that may not accurately reflect the actual risks and costs associated with primary-site esophageal cancer. Lastly, this bill fails to address the underlying issue of personal responsibility and individual health choices. Rather than relying on government intervention and presumptions, individuals should be encouraged to take personal responsibility for their health and make informed decisions regarding their lifestyle and occupational risks. By creating a presumption of work-relatedness, this bill may inadvertently discourage individuals from taking necessary precautions and making healthier choices, as they may rely on the assumption that any health issues will be covered by insurance. In conclusion, while the intention of Bill 127 2023 may be to support firefighters and fire investigators, it raises concerns from a right-wing anti-government perspective. It undermines individual responsibility, imposes additional costs on employers and taxpayers, interferes with the insurance industry, and fails to address personal health choices.
First Reading
  • June 7, 2023, noon
  • In Progress
  • Read