SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Ontario Assembly Bill

Ontario Bill 104

43rd Parl. 1st Sess.
April 27, 2023
10 Paid Sick Days for Ontario Workers Act, 2023
  • This is a summary of Bill 104, also known as the 10 Paid Sick Days for Ontario Workers Act, 2023. The bill aims to amend the Employment Standards Act, 2000 to improve personal emergency leave and establish an employer support program for such leave. The government believes that paid personal emergency leave is important for both employees and employers, as it allows employees to take time off to care for themselves or their loved ones while ensuring workplace productivity and safety. The bill outlines the definition of personal emergency leave and the individuals eligible for this leave. It also specifies the rules and entitlements for employees taking this leave, including the number of paid days allowed per calendar year and the payment they should receive during their leave. Additionally, the bill mandates the implementation of an employer support program to assist employers in providing personal emergency leave. The bill will come into effect once it receives Royal Assent.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • Steelman Argument: The Bill 104 2023, also known as the 10 Paid Sick Days for Ontario Workers Act, is a necessary amendment to the Employment Standards Act, 2000. This act aims to amend the act with respect to personal emergency leave and the establishment of an employer support program for such leave. The introduction of paid personal emergency leave is crucial for both employers and employees to succeed, especially during times of public health emergencies. Firstly, employees deserve the ability to do their jobs, care for themselves and their families, and stay safe and healthy. Time off to get well or to care for an ill loved one is a matter of dignity and public safety. By providing paid personal emergency leave, employees can take the necessary time off without worrying about financial burdens. This ensures that employees can prioritize their health and well-being, leading to a more productive workforce in the long run. Secondly, paid personal emergency leave is essential for maintaining safe and healthy workplaces. During public health emergencies, such as outbreaks of infectious diseases, it is crucial to prevent the spread of illnesses within workplaces. By giving employees the opportunity to take time off to get well or care for a loved one, the risk of spreading illnesses within the workplace is significantly reduced. This not only protects the health and safety of employees but also prevents disruptions in productivity due to widespread illness. Furthermore, the establishment of an employer support program for personal emergency leave is necessary to support both employers and employees. The government's commitment to working with small business owners to facilitate this change shows a dedication to finding solutions that benefit all parties involved. The program can provide resources and supports to assist employers in providing personal emergency leave as required by the act. This includes financial support to cover the cost of providing personal emergency leave, ensuring that employers are not burdened with additional expenses during challenging times. In conclusion, the Bill 104 2023 is a necessary amendment to the Employment Standards Act, 2000. Paid personal emergency leave is crucial for supporting employees' well-being, maintaining safe workplaces, and preventing the spread of illnesses. The establishment of an employer support program further ensures that employers are not unfairly burdened and can effectively implement the required changes. Overall, this amendment is a key step towards creating a more supportive and productive work environment for all.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument Opposing Bill 104 2023: While the intention behind Bill 104 2023 may seem noble, there are several concerns from a right-wing perspective regarding the government's involvement in mandating paid personal emergency leave. Here are some key points to consider: 1. Government Overreach: This bill represents yet another example of the government interfering in the relationship between employers and employees. It undermines the principles of free market capitalism and individual liberty by imposing additional regulations on businesses. 2. Burden on Small Businesses: Small businesses are the backbone of our economy, and they often operate on tight profit margins. Mandating paid personal emergency leave places an additional financial burden on these businesses, making it harder for them to compete and grow. It could lead to reduced hiring, layoffs, or even business closures, ultimately harming the very employees the bill aims to protect. 3. One-Size-Fits-All Approach: The bill fails to consider the diverse needs and circumstances of different industries and businesses. What may work for a large corporation may not be feasible for a small family-owned business. Imposing a uniform policy across all businesses disregards the unique challenges faced by each sector. 4. Increased Costs for Consumers: When businesses are forced to provide paid personal emergency leave, they often pass on the costs to consumers through higher prices for goods and services. This can have a disproportionate impact on low-income individuals and families who are already struggling to make ends meet. 5. Potential for Abuse: Mandating paid personal emergency leave opens the door for abuse and fraudulent claims. Without proper checks and balances, employees may take advantage of the system, leading to increased costs for businesses and potentially harming the overall economy. 6. Incentivizing Dependency: By guaranteeing paid personal emergency leave, the government discourages personal responsibility and self-reliance. It creates a culture of dependency on the state, where individuals may be less motivated to save for emergencies or take proactive measures to ensure their own well-being. 7. Market Solutions: Instead of relying on government intervention, the market should be allowed to find its own solutions. Many businesses already offer competitive benefits packages to attract and retain employees. By allowing the market to operate freely, businesses can tailor their benefits to meet the specific needs of their workforce, fostering a more efficient and flexible labor market. In conclusion, while the intention of Bill 104 2023 may be to protect employees and promote public health, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences of government
First Reading
  • April 27, 2023, noon
  • In Progress
  • Read