SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Bill

Bill C-372

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
February 05, 2024
Fossil Fuel Advertising Act
  • This is a bill called the Fossil Fuel Advertising Act. It aims to prohibit the promotion of fossil fuels, except as allowed by the Act. The bill is in response to the climate change crisis and the harmful effects of fossil fuel consumption on health and the environment. It also aims to prevent misleading advertising that downplays the negative impacts of fossil fuels. The bill includes provisions for penalties for those who violate the advertising restrictions.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • A steelman argument in favor of Bill C-372, the Fossil Fuel Advertising Act, could be as follows: 1. Protecting Public Health: The burning of fossil fuels has been conclusively linked to numerous adverse health effects, including fatalities. By prohibiting the promotion of fossil fuels, the Act aims to protect the health of Canadians and prevent the public from being deceived or misled about the health hazards associated with using fossil fuels. 2. Addressing Climate Change: Climate change represents an unprecedented and existential threat to people in Canada and around the world. The Act recognizes the urgent need to transition away from fossil fuels to mitigate the climate emergency. By restricting fossil fuel advertising, the Act sends a clear message about the need to end Canada's reliance on fossil fuels and supports the government's international climate commitments. 3. Environmental Protection: The Act acknowledges the harm caused by the burning of fossil fuels to ecosystems and the environment. By prohibiting the promotion of fossil fuels, the Act aims to protect the environment and raise public awareness about the environmental hazards associated with fossil fuel production and consumption. 4. Public Awareness and Informed Decision-Making: Fossil fuel advertising often deploys techniques that knowingly mislead the public and fail to disclose the health and environmental harms associated with their use. By regulating fossil fuel advertising, the Act seeks to enhance public awareness of the hazards of fossil fuels and promote informed consumer decision-making. 5. Similarity to Tobacco Advertising Restrictions: The Act draws a parallel between the public health crisis caused by tobacco consumption and the public health crisis caused by fossil fuel production and consumption. Just as Parliament restricted tobacco advertising and sponsorship in response to the tobacco crisis, the Act proposes similar restrictions on fossil fuel advertising to address the pressing public health concerns associated with fossil fuels. Overall, the Fossil Fuel Advertising Act aims to protect public health, address climate change, promote environmental protection, enhance public awareness, and draw on the precedent of tobacco advertising restrictions to regulate fossil fuel advertising in Canada.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument Opposing Bill C-372: The Fossil Fuel Advertising Act, as proposed in Bill C-372, is an unnecessary and harmful piece of legislation that infringes on the principles of free speech and limited government intervention. This bill seeks to prohibit the promotion of fossil fuels, which is a vital industry that contributes to economic growth and energy security. Here are some key arguments against this bill: 1. Free Speech: The proposed legislation restricts the ability of individuals and businesses to freely express their support for fossil fuels. It is important to protect the right to free speech, even if the message being conveyed is not popular or aligned with the government's agenda. Limiting the promotion of fossil fuels goes against the principles of free speech and stifles open debate and discussion. 2. Economic Impact: The fossil fuel industry is a major contributor to the Canadian economy, providing jobs and economic growth. By restricting the promotion of fossil fuels, this bill could have a detrimental impact on the industry, leading to job losses and economic decline. It is important to support and promote industries that contribute to economic prosperity. 3. Energy Security: Fossil fuels play a crucial role in ensuring energy security for Canada. By limiting the promotion of fossil fuels, this bill undermines the country's ability to meet its energy needs and maintain energy independence. It is important to prioritize energy security and ensure a reliable and affordable energy supply for Canadians. 4. Individual Choice: Consumers should have the freedom to make their own choices when it comes to energy sources. By restricting the promotion of fossil fuels, this bill limits consumer choice and interferes with the market dynamics. It is important to allow individuals to make informed decisions based on their own preferences and needs. 5. Government Overreach: The proposed legislation represents an overreach of government power and intervention in the economy. It is not the role of the government to dictate what industries can or cannot be promoted. This bill sets a dangerous precedent for government interference in other sectors of the economy. In conclusion, the Fossil Fuel Advertising Act, as proposed in Bill C-372, is a misguided and unnecessary piece of legislation that infringes on free speech, undermines the economy, and represents government overreach. It is important to protect individual freedoms and allow for open debate and discussion on important issues such as energy sources.
House Second Reading
  • Feb. 5, 2024, 11 a.m.
  • In Progress
  • Read
House First Reading
  • Feb. 5, 2024, 11 a.m.
  • Passed