SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Bill

Bill C-371

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 13, 2023
Rail Passenger Priority Act
  • This is a bill called the Rail Passenger Priority Act that aims to amend the Canada Transportation Act. The amendment requires railway companies to prioritize passenger rail service over the movement of freight. It also introduces administrative monetary penalties for companies that do not comply with this requirement. The bill was introduced in the House of Commons and is available on their website.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • Steelman Argument in Favor of Bill C-371: One possible steelman argument in favor of Bill C-371, the Rail Passenger Priority Act, is that it prioritizes the needs and interests of passengers, which can lead to improved public transportation and increased accessibility for individuals who rely on passenger rail services. 1. Enhancing Passenger Experience: By requiring railway companies to give priority to passenger rail service over the movement of freight, this legislation aims to improve the overall experience for passengers. This can include more reliable and punctual train schedules, reduced overcrowding, and increased comfort during travel. Prioritizing passenger needs can lead to a more enjoyable and efficient transportation experience. 2. Promoting Sustainable Transportation: Prioritizing passenger rail service can contribute to a shift towards more sustainable transportation options. By encouraging individuals to choose trains over private vehicles or airplanes, this legislation can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions and alleviate traffic congestion. Passenger rail service can be a more environmentally friendly alternative, especially for long-distance travel. 3. Increasing Accessibility: By giving priority to passenger rail service, this legislation can improve accessibility for individuals who rely on trains as their primary mode of transportation. This includes people with disabilities, seniors, and those who cannot afford or do not have access to private vehicles. Prioritizing passenger rail service can ensure that these individuals have reliable and accessible transportation options, promoting inclusivity and equal opportunities for all. 4. Economic Benefits: A well-functioning passenger rail service can have positive economic impacts. It can attract tourists, boost local economies, and create job opportunities in the transportation sector. By prioritizing passenger rail service, this legislation can contribute to the growth and development of communities along rail lines, benefiting both urban and rural areas. 5. Safety Considerations: Prioritizing passenger rail service can also have safety benefits. By reducing conflicts between passenger trains and freight trains, the risk of accidents and collisions can be minimized. This legislation can help ensure that passenger rail service operates in a safe and secure manner, prioritizing the well-being of passengers. In summary, the Rail Passenger Priority Act, as proposed in Bill C-371, aims to prioritize the needs of passengers, enhance their experience, promote sustainable transportation, increase accessibility, and provide economic and safety benefits. By giving priority to passenger rail service, this legislation can contribute to a more efficient, inclusive, and environmentally friendly transportation system.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument Opposing Bill C-371: While the intention behind Bill C-371 may be to prioritize passenger rail service, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences of such a policy. This bill goes against the principles of free market competition and limited government intervention, which are core tenets of right-wing ideology. 1. Inefficient Allocation of Resources: Requiring railway companies to prioritize passenger rail service over the movement of freight could lead to an inefficient allocation of resources. Freight transportation is crucial for the economy, as it ensures the timely delivery of goods and supports businesses across various sectors. By prioritizing passenger rail service, the government is potentially hindering the movement of goods, which could have negative implications for businesses and consumers. 2. Market Distortion: The government's interference in the operations of railway companies by mandating priority for passenger rail service creates a distortion in the market. It undermines the ability of these companies to make decisions based on market demand and profitability. By imposing such regulations, the government is essentially picking winners and losers in the transportation industry, which goes against the principles of free market competition. 3. Increased Costs: Implementing this legislation could result in increased costs for both railway companies and consumers. Railway companies may need to invest in additional infrastructure and resources to accommodate the prioritization of passenger rail service. These costs could be passed on to consumers in the form of higher ticket prices or reduced service quality. Moreover, the administrative monetary penalties outlined in the bill could further burden railway companies financially, potentially leading to negative consequences for their operations and overall competitiveness. 4. Limited Government Intervention: Right-wing ideology emphasizes limited government intervention in the economy. By mandating priority for passenger rail service, the government is overstepping its boundaries and interfering in the operations of private companies. It is not the role of the government to dictate how businesses should prioritize their services. Instead, the government should focus on creating a conducive environment for competition and innovation, allowing market forces to determine the most efficient allocation of resources. In conclusion, while the intention behind Bill C-371 may be to prioritize passenger rail service, it is important to consider the potential negative consequences of such a policy. This legislation goes against the principles of free market competition and limited government intervention, which are core tenets of right-wing ideology.
House Second Reading
  • Dec. 13, 2023, 2 p.m.
  • In Progress
  • Read
House First Reading
  • Dec. 13, 2023, 2 p.m.
  • Passed