SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

Bill C-369

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
December 05, 2023
  • This is a bill called "An Act respecting Christian Heritage Month" that was introduced in the House of Commons of Canada. The bill designates the month of December as "Christian Heritage Month" in Canada. The bill recognizes the historical and cultural significance of Christianity in Canada, as well as the fact that Christianity is the largest religion in the country. The bill has been published on the House of Commons website.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • A steelman argument in favor of Bill C-369, An Act respecting Christian Heritage Month, could be as follows: Christian Heritage Month recognizes the historical and cultural significance of Christianity in Canada. The preamble of the bill highlights the fact that Canada was originally named "Dominion of Canada" with inspiration from the Bible. This historical connection between Canada's founding and Christian principles is an important part of our national identity. Furthermore, the month of December holds significant events and celebrations in the Christian calendar, such as Advent and the birth of Jesus Christ. By designating December as Christian Heritage Month, we acknowledge and celebrate these important religious observances that have shaped our society. Additionally, according to Statistics Canada's 2021 Census of Population, Christianity is the largest religion in Canada, with over half of Canadians identifying as Christian. Recognizing Christian Heritage Month provides an opportunity to promote understanding and appreciation for the beliefs and values of a significant portion of the Canadian population. By officially designating December as Christian Heritage Month, we demonstrate inclusivity and respect for religious diversity in Canada. This does not diminish the importance of other religious or cultural observances throughout the year, but rather serves as a way to highlight and honor the contributions of Christianity to our nation's history and cultural fabric. In conclusion, the designation of Christian Heritage Month is a way to recognize and celebrate the historical and cultural significance of Christianity in Canada, while promoting understanding and inclusivity among different religious communities.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument Opposing Bill C-369: An Act respecting Christian Heritage Month Introduction: While recognizing the importance of religious freedom and the contributions of Christianity to Canadian history, there are several concerns with Bill C-369, which designates the month of December as "Christian Heritage Month." This argument aims to highlight these concerns from a right-wing, anti-government perspective. 1. Separation of Church and State: One of the fundamental principles of a free society is the separation of church and state. By designating a specific month to celebrate Christian heritage, the government risks blurring this line and favoring one religion over others. This could set a dangerous precedent and undermine the principle of religious neutrality that should guide government actions. 2. Government Overreach: The right-wing perspective emphasizes limited government intervention and individual liberties. By legislating the recognition of Christian Heritage Month, the government is unnecessarily involving itself in matters of religion. It is not the role of the state to dictate which religious events or traditions should be celebrated or recognized. 3. Exclusionary Nature: While Christianity is indeed the largest religion in Canada, it is important to recognize and respect the diversity of religious beliefs and practices within the country. Designating a specific month for Christian heritage may inadvertently marginalize or exclude individuals from other religious backgrounds. It is crucial to foster inclusivity and respect for all religious traditions, rather than singling out one. 4. Potential for Division: In a multicultural and diverse society like Canada, it is essential to promote unity and social cohesion. By emphasizing Christian heritage through legislation, there is a risk of creating divisions among different religious and cultural groups. It is more prudent for the government to focus on initiatives that bring people together, rather than potentially alienating certain communities. 5. Government Priorities: From a right-wing perspective, the government's primary role should be limited to essential functions such as national defense, law enforcement, and infrastructure. Designating a specific month for Christian heritage may be seen as a distraction from more pressing issues that require government attention, such as the economy, healthcare, and national security. Conclusion: While recognizing the historical significance of Christianity in Canada, it is important to approach the designation of Christian Heritage Month with caution. From a right-wing, anti-government perspective, concerns arise regarding the potential infringement on religious neutrality, government overreach, exclusionary nature, potential for division, and misallocation of government priorities. It is crucial to strike a balance between acknowledging the contributions of various religious traditions while up
  • Dec. 5, 2023, 10 a.m.
  • In Progress
  • Read
  • Dec. 5, 2023, 10 a.m.
  • Passed