SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Bill

Bill C-263

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
March 29, 2022
Responsible Business Conduct Abroad Act
  • Bill C-263, known as the Responsible Business Conduct Abroad Act, establishes the Office of the Commissioner for Responsible Business Conduct Abroad. The Commissioner is authorized to monitor and investigate the business activities of certain Canadian entities operating abroad to ensure their compliance with international human rights law. This Act applies to entities that manufacture, import, offer services, or control other entities involved in these activities. The Commissioner's role is to report on the entities' compliance and make recommendations for improvement. The Act also includes provisions for complaints, investigations, and penalties for obstruction or providing false information.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • Steelman argument in favor of Bill C-263: Bill C-263, the Responsible Business Conduct Abroad Act, establishes the Office of the Commissioner for Responsible Business Conduct Abroad. This office will monitor and investigate the business activities of certain Canadian entities operating abroad to ensure compliance with international human rights law. Advocates of this bill argue that it is necessary to hold Canadian entities accountable for their actions abroad. Canadian businesses often have a significant impact on local communities and the environment in the countries where they operate. This legislation ensures that these businesses adhere to international human rights standards, protecting the rights of local workers, communities, and the environment. By establishing an independent Commissioner with the power to investigate, report, and make recommendations, this bill provides a mechanism for meaningful oversight and enforcement.

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman Argument: Opponents of Bill C-263, the Responsible Business Conduct Abroad Act, may argue that the establishment of the Office of the Commissioner for Responsible Business Conduct Abroad and the monitoring and investigation of Canadian entities operating abroad is unnecessary and burdensome. They may argue that the existing legal framework and voluntary corporate social responsibility initiatives already address human rights concerns and promote responsible business conduct. They may also argue that the Act places an unjustified burden on Canadian businesses, especially small and medium-sized enterprises, by subjecting them to additional regulations and compliance requirements. They may argue that these businesses already face significant challenges and costs in operating internationally, and that the Act may hinder their ability to compete globally. Opponents may further argue that the Act may discourage foreign investment
House First Reading
  • March 29, 2022, 10 a.m.
  • In Progress
  • Read