SoVote

Decentralized Democracy

House Bill

Bill C-247

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
February 08, 2022
Prohibition of Fur Farming
  • Bill C-247, also known as the Prohibition of Fur Farming Act, aims to establish prohibitions and offences related to fur farming. It prohibits owning, operating, breeding, inseminating, slaughtering, giving, renting, selling, or transporting fur-bearing animals for commercial purposes. Anyone who violates these prohibitions can be fined up to $250,000 or imprisoned for up to two years. The court may also make additional orders, such as prohibiting the accused from owning or residing with an animal and requiring them to pay for the costs incurred by an organization taking care of a fur-bearing animal. Fur-bearing animals may be forfeited to the government and must be disposed of as directed by the Minister. The Act will come into force one year after it receives royal assent.
  • H1
  • H2
  • H3
  • S1
  • S2
  • S3
  • RA
  • Yea
  • Nay
  • star_border

SteelmanSpren in Favour

  • Steelman argument in favor of Bill C-247: One could argue in favor of Bill C-247, the Prohibition of Fur Farming Act, on the grounds of animal welfare and ethical considerations. This legislation seeks to prohibit fur farming, which involves keeping fur-bearing animals in captivity for the sole purpose of using their pelts for commercial purposes. The argument is that fur farming is inherently cruel and goes against the principles of treating animals with respect and compassion. By banning fur farming, the Act aims to protect fur-bearing animals from unnecessary suffering and exploitation. It recognizes the intrinsic value of animals and acknowledges that they should not be treated solely as commodities for human consumption or fashion. This legislation aligns with the growing global movement towards ethical treatment of animals and reflects society's changing attitudes towards using animals for fashion purposes. Furthermore, the Act

SteelmanSpren Against

  • Steelman argument opposing the prohibition of fur farming: Fur farming plays an important role in the economy and should not be completely prohibited. It provides livelihoods for many individuals and contributes to economic growth. Banning fur farming would result in job losses and financial hardships for those employed in the industry. Additionally, fur products are highly valued by consumers who appreciate their quality and warmth. The prohibition of fur farming would limit consumer choice and eliminate an industry that meets the demands of a significant market segment. Instead of a complete ban, regulations can be implemented to ensure responsible and ethical practices in fur farming, addressing concerns related to animal welfare. These regulations can include strict standards for animal care, housing conditions, and monitoring of fur farms to ensure adherence to these standards. By promoting responsible fur farming practices, we ca
House First Reading
  • Feb. 8, 2022, 10 a.m.
  • In Progress
  • Read

House Debates

44th Parl. 1st Sess.
February 08, 2022